Article View: comp.std.c++
Article #3104Re: Give operator. a chance
From: Andrew Koenig
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 1996 05:33
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 1996 05:33
12 lines
1012 bytes
1012 bytes
In article <3102AD11.1663@et.se> Dan Holmsand <dan@et.se> writes: > Is operator.() banned from the standards discussion? Yes. -- --Andrew Koenig ark@research.att.com --- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. Submission address: std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu. Contact address: std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu. The moderation policy is summarized in http://dogbert.lbl.gov/~matt/std-c++/policy.html. ]
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<DLost8.H9B@research.att.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!cs.mu.OZ.AU!bounce-backReferences:
<3102AD11.1663@et.se>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!cs.mu.OZ.AU!bounce-back From: ark@research.att.com (Andrew Koenig) Subject: Re: Give operator. a chance Message-ID: <DLost8.H9B@research.att.com> Originator: fjh@munta.cs.mu.OZ.AU Sender: news@cs.mu.OZ.AU (CS-Usenet) Organization: AT&T Research, Murray Hill NJ References: <3102AD11.1663@et.se> X-Original-Date: Wed, 24 Jan 1996 13: 15:08 GMT Date: Thu, 25 Jan 1996 05:33:17 GMT Approved: fjh@cs.mu.oz.au X-Auth: PGPMoose V1.1 PGP comp.std.c++ iQBFAgUBMQcWK+EDnX0m9pzZAQEsOwF/fApgYImHozdH2BxC/Qe5cXg7LwOkP6jJ qgxzKHXfEAesilNmGvxdi7a55UroE5RK =Kvve