🚀 go-pugleaf

----------
From: 	Max Motovilov[SMTP:max@int.com]
Sent: 	Thursday, January 25, 1996 11:11 AM
To: 	'Eugene Lazutkin'
Subject: 	RE: FW: Inherent C++ problem?

> Here is part of the relevent section in the draft standard:
> 
> 12.2 Temporary objects
> While evaluating an expression, it might be necessary or convenient
> for an implementation to generate temporary objects to hold values
> resulting from the evaluation of the expression's subexpressions.
> During this evaluation, precisely when such temporaries are
> introduced is unspecified.

Well, I guess it is exactly the "not explicit enough" thing, at least
when related to the case I described:

Foo	foo()
{
	return Foo( ...... );
}

Foo( ..... ) is a full expression rather than subexpression. So, is the
implementation _required_ to instantiate _this_ temporary under the
current standard?

Regards,
...Max...
---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  Submission address: std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu.
  Contact address: std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu.  The moderation policy
  is summarized in http://dogbert.lbl.gov/~matt/std-c++/policy.html. ]