Re: Can we allow virtual function member declarations to be inherited?

Article View: comp.std.c++

Article #344

#344

From: Ron Guilmette
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 1990 07:40

15 lines
1357 bytes

In article <CLINE.90Aug15132637@cheetah.ece.clarkson.edu> cline@sun.soe.clarkson.edu (Marshall Cline) writes:
>In article <1069@lupine.NCD.COM> rfg@NCD.COM (Ron Guilmette) writes:
>>In article <37923@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> jbuck@galileo.berkeley.edu (Joe Buck) writes:
>
>I'd like to make an appeal: let's keep the C++ newsgroups friendly.  (I know
>this doesn't apply to Joe Buck, but...) There are many many many new C++ers.
>This is a good problem to have!  The X newsgroup has a `rep' for flaming
>beginners; that's a rep we don't need or want.

Point well taken.  My apologies to Joe and anyone else I may have offended.
-- 

// Ron Guilmette  -  C++ Entomologist
// Internet: rfg@ncd.com      uucp: ...uunet!lupine!rfg
// Motto:  If it sticks, force it.  If it breaks, it needed replacing anyway.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1207@lupine.NCD.COM>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!uunet!lupine!rfg

References: <37923@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> <1069@lupine.NCD.COM> <CLINE.90Aug15132637@cheetah.ece.clarkson.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!uunet!lupine!rfg
From: rfg@NCD.COM (Ron Guilmette)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
Subject: Re: Can we allow virtual function member declarations to be inherited?
Message-ID: <1207@lupine.NCD.COM>
Date: 16 Aug 90 07:40:54 GMT
References: <37923@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> <1069@lupine.NCD.COM> <CLINE.90Aug15132637@cheetah.ece.clarkson.edu>
Distribution: comp
Organization: Network Computing Devices, Inc., Mt. View, CA
Lines: 15

Reply to Parent Message