🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <2051@key.COM> perry@arkon.key.COM (Perry The Cynic) writes:
>
>However, Ron: if you want to write "simple portable" code (no customization,
>no conditionals), you cannot possibly expect to dictate to the compiler (that
>is *every* compiler) what layout strategy it should use. The compiler is
>responsible for reconciling the language requirements with the oddities of
>the hardware. The only thing you can resonably expect to specify is guidelines.

Well, yes and no.  I understand that I can only specify (as you call them)
guidelines, but I have a reasonable expectation that the following will be
interpreted the same way on virtually every machine I care about (and even
some that I don't care about):

	struct s {
		unsigned f1:7;
		unsigned f2:9;
		unsigned f3:4;
		unsigned f4:12;
	};
-- 

// Ron Guilmette  -  C++ Entomologist
// Internet: rfg@ncd.com      uucp: ...uunet!lupine!rfg
// Motto:  If it sticks, force it.  If it breaks, it needed replacing anyway.