🚀 go-pugleaf

clamage@Eng.sun.com (Steve Clamage) wrote:

>>2) From a previous post on this group, it looks like the standard will
>>allow one to define conversion operators for pre-existing, source code
>>untouchable data types.  Yes? No? What will this look like? I have the
>>May copy of the WP, and don't see any mention of this.
>
>I'm not sure I understand what you are asking. If you mean can you define
>a conversion operator from a user-defined class to a predefined type
>like int or double, then yes, that has long been part of C++.

I believe he was referring to something like

class myclass{};
operator int(const myclass &arg);

Just like the global equality operators, etc.



[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles: try just posting with      ]
[ your news-reader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu         ]
[ FAQ:      http://reality.sgi.com/employees/austern_mti/std-c++/faq.html    ]
[ Policy:   http://reality.sgi.com/employees/austern_mti/std-c++/policy.html ]
[ Comments? mailto:std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu                             ]