🚀 go-pugleaf

Nico Josuttis wrote:
> Why don't we use the string naming scheme ?
>  - Why is search() not also called find() ?
>  - Why is find_end() not called rfind() ?
> 
>   (I guess the missing algorithms do miss because
>    reverse iterators do the job)
> 

Without judging which one is better, I'd be quite inclined to 
agree that a single naming scheme would be much nicer to deal 
with!


-- 
#include <legalbs/standarddisclaimer>
Rich Paul                |  If you like what I say, tell my
C++, OOD, OOA, OOP,      |  employer, but if you don't,
OOPs, I forgot one ...   |  don't blame them.  ;->
---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles: Try just posting with your 
                newsreader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu
  comp.std.c++ FAQ: http://reality.sgi.com/austern/std-c++/faq.html
  Moderation policy: http://reality.sgi.com/austern/std-c++/policy.html
  Comments? mailto:std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu 
]