🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <199604102351.QAA11178@netcom15.netcom.com> Scott Meyers <smeyers@netcom.com> writes:
<I was under the impression that the use of a template name inside the
<definition of a class template was implicitly considered to be qualified
<by the template parameter(s).  For example, I thought that in
<
<  template <class T>
<  class Array {
<  public:
<    Array operator=(const Array& rhs);
<    ...
<  };
<  
<the declaration of operator= was legal, because the use of the token
<"Array" as a return type and a paramter was implicitly treated as if it
<were "Array<T>." Many compilers accept this, but I'm told that several
<reject it, and I can't find language in the January DWP that allows it. 

Doesn't section 14.2.1 ("Locally declared names") explicitly allow it?
-- 
Jan Bielawski
Molecular Simulations, Inc.   )\._.,--....,'``.         | http://www.msi.com
San Diego, CA                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.   | ph.: (619) 458-9990
jpb@msi.com              fL `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'   | fax: (619) 458-0136
-- 
---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles: Try just posting with your 
                newsreader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu
  comp.std.c++ FAQ: http://reality.sgi.com/austern/std-c++/faq.html
  Moderation policy: http://reality.sgi.com/austern/std-c++/policy.html
  Comments? mailto:std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu 
]