🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.std.c++
Article #408

Re: delete [] p

#408
From: Jim ADCOCK
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 1990 22:34
10 lines
932 bytes
Roughly speaking E&S corresponds to compilers claiming "2.1" compatibility.

delete [20] p verses delete [] p is a "2.0" to "2.1" difference.

This is discussed on pg 65 E&S.

I wouldn't be surprised compilers coming out in the near future allow
the old form as an anachronism -- issuing a warning, but accepting
the construct.  Don't be surprised if "2.0" compatible compilers
don't accept the "[]" construct.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <56845@microsoft.UUCP>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uunet!microsoft!jimad
References: <1990Aug16.162718.14828@sco.COM> <1231@lupine.NCD.COM> <1990Aug19.170256.21630@athena.mit.edu> <1253@lupine.NCD.COM> <1990Aug20.225638.18737@odin.corp.sgi.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uunet!microsoft!jimad
From: jimad@microsoft.UUCP (Jim ADCOCK)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
Subject: Re: delete [] p
Message-ID: <56845@microsoft.UUCP>
Date: 22 Aug 90 22:34:47 GMT
References: <1990Aug16.162718.14828@sco.COM> <1231@lupine.NCD.COM> <1990Aug19.170256.21630@athena.mit.edu> <1253@lupine.NCD.COM> <1990Aug20.225638.18737@odin.corp.sgi.com>
Reply-To: jimad@microsoft.UUCP (Jim ADCOCK)
Organization: Microsoft Corp., Redmond WA
Lines: 10