Re: Randomly ordered fields !?!? (Was: "packed" objects)

Article View: comp.std.c++

Article #420

#420

From: Doug Lea
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 1990 16:40

12 lines
1172 bytes

Perhaps among the best arguments for allowing compilers to at least
sometimes reorder fields is to simply make conceivable someday the use
of C++ adaptations of the clever MI layout algorithms described in
Pugh & Weddell's SIGPLAN '90 conference paper.

For what it's worth, I think that the suggestion that compilers obey
programmer field ordering only inside `extern "C"' sounds fine.
--
Doug Lea, Computer Science Dept., SUNY Oswego, Oswego, NY, 13126 (315)341-2688
email: dl@g.oswego.edu            or dl@cat.syr.edu
UUCP :...cornell!devvax!oswego!dl or ...rutgers!sunybcs!oswego!dl

Technical Details

Message-ID: <DL.90Aug25124455@g.g.oswego.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!ub!oswego!news

References: <56638@microsoft.UUCP> <1229@lupine.NCD.COM> <56744@microsoft.UUCP> <1313@lupine.NCD.COM>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!ub!oswego!news
From: dl@g.g.oswego.edu (Doug Lea)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
Subject: Re: Randomly ordered fields !?!? (Was: "packed" objects)
Message-ID: <DL.90Aug25124455@g.g.oswego.edu>
Date: 25 Aug 90 16:40:50 GMT
References: <56638@microsoft.UUCP> <1229@lupine.NCD.COM> <56744@microsoft.UUCP>
 <1313@lupine.NCD.COM>
Sender: news@oswego.Oswego.EDU (Network News)
Reply-To: dl@g.oswego.edu
Organization: SUNY Oswego
Lines: 12
In-reply-to: rfg@NCD.COM's message of 24 Aug 90 06:10:47 GMT

Reply to Parent Message