🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <27304544.3658@marob.masa.com> cowan@marob.masa.com (John Cowan) writes:

[regards overloadable operator dot]

>Would a knowledgeable person tell me by e-mail how to get this idea before
>the ANSI committee?  I know the answer is "send in a recommendation";
>what I want is address, format of request, etc.

In theory, what one is suppose to do is send the request to Lenkov or
Miller.  I have already done so, in regards to overloadable operator dot.
[ I'll post a plain-text copy of the request here. ]

I say "in theory" because I have never received any acknowledgement from
either, either in regards to my overloaded operator dot submission, nor
in response for request for [non-voting] membership information.

[ What Gives, Guys ??? ]

Please join me in lobbying for overloadable operator dot.  The people who
I've sent copies of the operator dot request to, who are suppose to be
responsible are:

Dmitry Lenkov
HP California Language Lab
19447 Pruneridge Avenue MS 47 LE
Cupertino CA 95014

William M. Miller
Glockenspiel Ltd.
PO Box 366
Sudbury, MA 01776-0003