Article View: comp.std.c++
Article #60volatile and redefinitions
From: Joe Fasano
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 1992 22:18
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 1992 22:18
18 lines
799 bytes
799 bytes
Question:
If 2 declarations (not definitions) differ only by the
type specifier volatile, is this considered an illegal redefinition
( illegal in ANSI C) ?
extern int i;
extern volatile int i;
joe@veritas.com
--
-------------------------------------------------------------
joe ARPAnet: veritas!joe@apple.com
joe@veritas.com UUCPnet: {apple,pyramid}!veritas!joe
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Aug04.221841.9370@Veritas.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!convex!darwin.sura.net!mips!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!sun-barr!olivea!veritas!joeShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!convex!darwin.sura.net!mips!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!sun-barr!olivea!veritas!joe From: joe@Veritas.COM (Joe Fasano) Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Subject: volatile and redefinitions Keywords: volatile Message-ID: <1992Aug04.221841.9370@Veritas.COM> Date: 4 Aug 92 22:18:41 GMT Sender: joe@veritas.com Distribution: comp.std.c++ Organization: VERITAS Software Lines: 18