Article View: comp.std.c++
Article #67Re: legal declarations?
From: Jerry Schwarz
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1992 00:52
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1992 00:52
19 lines
1215 bytes
1215 bytes
In article <1992Aug8.154018.20331@mole-end.matawan.nj.us>, mat@mole-end.matawan.nj.us writes: |> In article <4054@seti.UUCP>, Daniel.Edelson@inria.fr (Daniel R. Edelson) writes: |> > Is "char char c;" a legal declaration? |> > |> > Is there language in the draft standard |> > that prohibits "char int c;"? |> |> See 7.1.8 of the ARM, which states that with the exception of `long' and |> `int', at most one _type-specifier_ may be present in a declaration. |> |> I see no reason why x3j16/WG 22 would drop this requirement. Whether it |> will be rephrased, of course, is another question. Previous empty message was result of incorrect button selection. What I meant to say is 7.1.6/3 (there is no 7.1.8) contradicts 7.1.6/1 beacuse it allows "long int". -- Jerry
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Aug10.005215.19729@lucid.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!lucid.com!lucid.com!jssReferences:
<4054@seti.UUCP> <1992Aug8.154018.20331@mole-end.matawan.nj.us>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!lucid.com!lucid.com!jss From: jss@lucid.com (Jerry Schwarz) Subject: Re: legal declarations? Message-ID: <1992Aug10.005215.19729@lucid.com> Sender: usenet@lucid.com Reply-To: jss@lucid.com (Jerry Schwarz) Organization: Lucid, Inc. References: <4054@seti.UUCP> <1992Aug8.154018.20331@mole-end.matawan.nj.us> Date: Mon, 10 Aug 92 00:52:15 GMT Lines: 20