Re: Array anachronisms

Article View: comp.std.c++

Article #673

#673

From: mjv
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 12:44

17 lines
1023 bytes

> From: jimad@microsoft.com (Jim Adcock)
> Subject: Re: Array anachronisms
> Message-ID: <1992Nov11.004038.17772@microsoft.com>
> Date: 11 Nov 92 00:40:38 GMT
> Since non-C-braindead-flavors of arrays can easily be implemented using
> templates, why invent a new slightly-less-braindead implementation of 
> arrays built-in to C++?  Instead, lobby the C++ libraries committee to
> put the arrays features you like into their proposed array class 
template.

Sounds reasonable.  I look forward to seeing a proposal and/or suggested
improvement to the current proposal (X3J16/92-0005R1, WG21/N0084).
--
Mike Vilot,   ObjectCraft Inc.,   Nashua NH  USA
mjv@objects.mv.com
X3J16 Library WG

Technical Details

Message-ID: <9211121744013030@mv.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!emory!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!eff!world!mv!objects

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!emory!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!eff!world!mv!objects
From: mjv@mv.com
Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
Subject: Re: Array anachronisms
Message-ID: <9211121744013030@mv.com>
Date: 12 Nov 92 12:44:01 GMT
Article-I.D.: mv.9211121744013030
Lines: 17
X-Mailer: rnMac Buggy, I mean Beta, Test Version