Re: The concept of templates considered ill designed

Article View: comp.std.c++

Article #692

#692

From: Andrew Koenig
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 1992 13:42

8 lines
835 bytes

In article <Eep9xSi00Vp_4391Iw@andrew.cmu.edu> osoelgaultier+@CMU.EDU (Stefan Monnier) writes:

> Who said there was no drawbacks ?

You implied it, by not mentioning any earlier.
-- 
				--Andrew Koenig
				  ark@europa.att.com

Technical Details

Message-ID: <23845@alice.att.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!portal!lll-winken!uwm.edu!linac!att!att!allegra!alice!ark

References:

<1992Oct6.020042.11130@cadsun.corp.mot.com> <1992Oct6.174129.10404@genghis.borland.com> <UeoW1kS00awV0GbEpY@andrew.cmu.edu> <1992Oct7.170351.16316@genghis.borland.com> <Eep9xSi00Vp_4391Iw@andrew.cmu.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!portal!lll-winken!uwm.edu!linac!att!att!allegra!alice!ark
From: ark@alice.att.com (Andrew Koenig)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c++,comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: The concept of templates considered ill designed
Message-ID: <23845@alice.att.com>
Date: 9 Oct 92 13:42:06 GMT
References: <1992Oct6.020042.11130@cadsun.corp.mot.com> <1992Oct6.174129.10404@genghis.borland.com> <UeoW1kS00awV0GbEpY@andrew.cmu.edu> <1992Oct7.170351.16316@genghis.borland.com> <Eep9xSi00Vp_4391Iw@andrew.cmu.edu>
Reply-To: ark@alice.UUCP ()
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill NJ
Lines: 8

Reply to Parent Message