Re: Exponentiation operator proposal

Article View: comp.std.c++

Article #712

#712

From: Nathan Myers
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1992 19:05

9 lines
844 bytes

I have long ignored "exponentiation proposal" notes, but it seems
time to point out that there is no operator~(T,T) defined yet.
Simply allowing it to be defined would permit experimentation,
without committing anybody to a bigger language if the use didn't
"catch on".

Nathan Myers
myersn@roguewave.com

Technical Details

Message-ID: <Bw8ADK.144@news.orst.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!sequent!news.orst.edu!hobo.ECE.ORST.EDU!myersn

References: <BuJJxs.8Hx@world.std.com> <23663@alice.att.com> <1992Oct14.225725.16486@microsoft.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!sequent!news.orst.edu!hobo.ECE.ORST.EDU!myersn
From: myersn@hobo.ECE.ORST.EDU (Nathan Myers)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c++,comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: Exponentiation operator proposal
Message-ID: <Bw8ADK.144@news.orst.edu>
Date: 16 Oct 92 19:05:38 GMT
Article-I.D.: news.Bw8ADK.144
References: <BuJJxs.8Hx@world.std.com> <23663@alice.att.com> <1992Oct14.225725.16486@microsoft.com>
Sender: usenet@news.orst.edu
Organization: ECE Dept.,OSU,Corvallis
Lines: 9
Nntp-Posting-Host: hobo.ece.orst.edu

Reply to Parent Message