Re: abstraction (was: Re: Give me a break)

Article View: comp.std.c++

Article #77

#77

From: Jim Adcock
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1992 18:05

6 lines
766 bytes

In article <1992Jul23.020241.11513@cmcl2.nyu.edu> checker@acf3.nyu.edu (Christopher Hecker) writes:
|Hmm, I'm not sure you want to make this argument.  Carried to its
|extreme, we could say, why are so many people using OWL?

How many people ARE using it?  If many people are using it, why aren't the
other compiler vendors licensing it?

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Jul23.180535.9525@microsoft.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!microsoft!hexnut!jimad

References: <1992Jul17.215414.15202@cmcl2.nyu.edu> <1992Jul20.232555.27851@microsoft.com> <1992Jul23.020241.11513@cmcl2.nyu.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!microsoft!hexnut!jimad
From: jimad@microsoft.com (Jim Adcock)
Subject: Re: abstraction (was: Re: Give me a break)
Message-ID: <1992Jul23.180535.9525@microsoft.com>
Date: 23 Jul 92 18:05:35 GMT
Organization: Microsoft Corporation
References: <1992Jul17.215414.15202@cmcl2.nyu.edu> <1992Jul20.232555.27851@microsoft.com> <1992Jul23.020241.11513@cmcl2.nyu.edu>
Lines: 7

Reply to Parent Message