Article View: comp.std.c++
Article #778Re: Pre-proposal: ~const [Rev 1.6]
From: Joseph Pallas
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 1991 16:46
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 1991 16:46
15 lines
1041 bytes
1041 bytes
In <PCG.91Jan3145302@teachk.cs.aber.ac.uk> pcg@cs.aber.ac.uk (Piercarlo Grandi) writes: >One problem of the current definition of >'inline' is that it specifies that every time the given function is >called, it should be inlined. In other words, 'inline' currently means >'can inline, *must* inline'. This is entirely wrong. Unless the standard has changed the language or intent of the ARM, 'inline' is a hint, and nothing more. See p. 99 of E&S. Complain about particular implementations to their vendors. joe
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<pallas.663007582@red-dwarf>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!uunet!pmafire!uudell!bigtex!texsun!sundc!newstop!exodus!red-dwarf!pallasReferences:
<NGO.90Dec14093655@tammy.harvard.edu> <60083@microsoft.UUCP> <PCG.91Jan3145302@teachk.cs.aber.ac.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!uunet!pmafire!uudell!bigtex!texsun!sundc!newstop!exodus!red-dwarf!pallas From: pallas@eng.sun.com (Joseph Pallas) Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Subject: Re: Pre-proposal: ~const [Rev 1.6] Message-ID: <pallas.663007582@red-dwarf> Date: 4 Jan 91 16:46:22 GMT References: <NGO.90Dec14093655@tammy.harvard.edu> <60083@microsoft.UUCP> <PCG.91Jan3145302@teachk.cs.aber.ac.uk> Sender: news@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM Distribution: comp Lines: 15