Article View: comp.std.c++
Article #79Re: Alternatives to operator.()
From: William M Miller
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 01:03
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 01:03
16 lines
1239 bytes
1239 bytes
In article <9220604.6372@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU>, Fergus James HENDERSON writes: > There are also several ways of hiding away the circumlocution, if it still > bothers you (variations on the usual macro-hackery). Yes, I think both of these are better than "(&r)->query_status()"; however, they are both still circumlocutions. This may be an opportune time to point out that I have never claimed that any of my three objections was a "killer," i.e., something that made the proposal completely unacceptable; they are just points that have to be weighed against the obvious attractions of the proposal. I think that posts like this, which reduce the negative impact of the problems, are exactly the kind of helpful contributions I would hope to see from the proposal's supporters. -- William M. Miller, wmm@world.std.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<BrvC9A.1AI@world.std.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!decwrl!world!wmmReferences:
<1992Jul23.024159.18039@microsoft.com> <BruME9.HGJ@world.std.com> <9220604.6372@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!decwrl!world!wmm From: wmm@world.std.com (William M Miller) Subject: Re: Alternatives to operator.() Message-ID: <BrvC9A.1AI@world.std.com> Organization: Software Emancipation Technology, Inc. References: <1992Jul23.024159.18039@microsoft.com> <BruME9.HGJ@world.std.com> <9220604.6372@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 01:03:10 GMT Lines: 16