Article View: comp.std.c++
Article #802Re: request for comments
From: Stanley Friesen
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 1991 15:48
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 1991 15:48
17 lines
1163 bytes
1163 bytes
In article <21@microsoft.UUCP> jimad@microsoft.UUCP (Jim ADCOCK) writes: |Is there any good reason why the restriction in 13.4 | |"An operator function must either be a member function or take at least one |argument of a class or a reference to a class." | |shouldn't be [clarified and] relaxed to: | |"An operator function must either be a member function or take at least one |argument of class type or of a type derived from a class type." I'm not sure I see the difference. A type derived from a class type is also a class type! The only real difference I see is that your proposed new version forgets to allow references, and is thus *more* restrictive. -- --------------- uunet!tdatirv!sarima (Stanley Friesen)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<95@tdatirv.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!spool2.mu.edu!uunet!tdatirv!sarimaReferences:
<21@microsoft.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!spool2.mu.edu!uunet!tdatirv!sarima From: sarima@tdatirv.UUCP (Stanley Friesen) Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Subject: Re: request for comments Message-ID: <95@tdatirv.UUCP> Date: 24 Jan 91 15:48:46 GMT References: <21@microsoft.UUCP> Reply-To: sarima@tdatirv.UUCP (Stanley Friesen) Organization: Teradata Corp., Irvine Lines: 17