Article View: comp.std.c++
Article #934Re: operator dot?
From: Ron Guilmette
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 1991 02:55
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 1991 02:55
11 lines
847 bytes
847 bytes
In article <70904@microsoft.UUCP> jimad@microsoft.UUCP (Jim ADCOCK) writes: >Does anyone know what happened to consideration of overloadable operator dot? We can only hope that people realized that it was a horrible idea, and that it then died a quiet and lonely death. -- // Ron Guilmette - C++ Entomologist // Internet: rfg@ncd.com uucp: ...uunet!lupine!rfg // New motto: If it ain't broke, try using a bigger hammer.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4327@lupine.NCD.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!infopiz!lupine!rfgReferences:
<70904@microsoft.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!infopiz!lupine!rfg From: rfg@NCD.COM (Ron Guilmette) Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Subject: Re: operator dot? Message-ID: <4327@lupine.NCD.COM> Date: 10 Mar 91 02:55:59 GMT References: <70904@microsoft.UUCP> Organization: Network Computing Devices, Inc., Mt. View, CA Lines: 11