🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

1 total messages Started by Volker Apelt Tue, 22 Aug 1995 23:21
Is this valid?
#1819
Author: Volker Apelt
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 1995 23:21
27 lines
1615 bytes
Is the declaration of two member functions which differ only in their
ctor-qualifiers valid c++?
eg.

class A {
public:
   T& elem(int n)const;
   T& elem(int n);
};

The April Working Paper says 
8.4 [dcl.fct.def]
5 A  cv-qualifier-seq can be part of a non-static member function decla
  ration, non-static member function definition, or  pointer  to  member
  function only; see _class.this_.  It is part of the function type.
				    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Thanks in advance
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Volker Apelt                            Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe Universitaet
Dipl. Chem.                             Institut fuer organische Chemie
				        Frankfurt/Main ( Germany )
va@krypton.org.chemie.uni-frankfurt.de  
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  Submission address: std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu.
  Contact address: std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu.  The moderation policy
  is summarized in http://dogbert.lbl.gov/~matt/std-c++/policy.html. ]
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads