Thread View: comp.std.c++
3 messages
3 total messages
Started by Tom Ayerst
Sat, 18 Nov 1995 19:10
Current status of standardisation process
Author: Tom Ayerst
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 1995 19:10
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 1995 19:10
14 lines
1009 bytes
1009 bytes
I have heard a rumour that the standardisation process has been delayed because of disagreement over inclusion of the STL. Please can someone tell me what the current situation is and/or where to find out such information in the future. Thank you Tom [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. Submission address: std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu. Contact address: std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu. The moderation policy is summarized in http://dogbert.lbl.gov/~matt/std-c++/policy.html. ]
Re: Current status of standardisation process
Author: Steve Clamage
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 1995 09:20
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 1995 09:20
29 lines
1949 bytes
1949 bytes
tayerst@cix.compulink.co.uk (Tom Ayerst) writes: >I have heard a rumour that the standardisation process has been delayed >because of disagreement over inclusion of the STL. There is no shortage of disagreements on the C++ Committee :-) but that rumor is false. Some proposed extensions to STL, and to C++ generally, have been rejected at committee meetings this year because accepting them would have delayed the schedule. >Please can someone tell me what the current situation is and/or where to >find out such information in the future. That information is posted here from time to time. The draft standard went out for public comment April through July 1995 (part of the ANSI process), and was accepted as a Committee Draft (part of the ISO process). A second CD will be required next year, along with a second public comment period, probably next April. If all goes well, that draft will be voted on by ISO member nations in 1996, and sent to ISO for publication as an International Standard (and in the US also as an ANSI Standard) in 1997. -- Steve Clamage, stephen.clamage@eng.sun.com --- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. Submission address: std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu. Contact address: std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu. The moderation policy is summarized in http://dogbert.lbl.gov/~matt/std-c++/policy.html. ]
Re: Current status of standardisation process
Author: John Max Skaller
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 1995 03:19
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 1995 03:19
29 lines
1940 bytes
1940 bytes
clamage@Eng.Sun.COM (Steve Clamage) wrote: >tayerst@cix.compulink.co.uk (Tom Ayerst) writes: > >>I have heard a rumour that the standardisation process has been delayed >>because of disagreement over inclusion of the STL. > >There is no shortage of disagreements on the C++ Committee :-) but >that rumor is false. Some proposed extensions to STL, and to C++ >generally, have been rejected at committee meetings this year >because accepting them would have delayed the schedule. If I can add to Steve's statement: contrary to this apparent rumour, STL RESCUED the C++ standardisation effort. Disagreement over incorporation was resolved quickly (in two meetings) and enabled a strongly focused effort, not only in the Library part of the effort, but also in other parts, particularly development and finalisation of template facilities. -- John Max Skaller voice: 61-2-566-2189 81 Glebe Point Rd fax: 61-2-660-0850 GLEBE NSW 2037 email: maxtal@suphys.physics.oz.au AUSTRALIA email: skaller@maxtal.com.au --- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. Submission address: std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu. Contact address: std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu. The moderation policy is summarized in http://dogbert.lbl.gov/~matt/std-c++/policy.html. ]
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads