🚀 go-pugleaf

Re: auto_ptr: :reset and auto_ptr::operator=
By: J. Kanze on Tue, 03 Oct 1995 02:25

Re: STL Traps and Pitfalls wanted
By: John Max Skaller on Tue, 03 Oct 1995 02:27

Re: auto_ptr: :reset and auto_ptr::operator=
By: Bill Gibbons on Mon, 02 Oct 1995 20:28

Enhancement Q: argc, argv, _argc, _argv, __argc, __argv
By: david on Sun, 01 Oct 1995 14:36

Re: Why not op delete(void* v&,size_t);?
By: David Vandevoorde on Mon, 02 Oct 1995 16:48

Why streambuf::pubsync?
By: Todd Blanchard on Mon, 02 Oct 1995 15:55

Re: auto_ptr: :reset and auto_ptr::operator=
By: Lars Farm on Mon, 02 Oct 1995 15:46

Re: Why not op delete(void* v&,size_t);?
By: Anil Kumar Vijendran on Mon, 02 Oct 1995 08:24

Re: Why not op delete(void* v&,size_t);?
By: Tim Hollebeek on Sat, 30 Sep 1995 19:51

Re: Alignment
By: Bob Kline on Sun, 01 Oct 1995 22:21

Re: Do we need a standard isPointer() function?
By: David Vandevoorde on Sat, 30 Sep 1995 02:09

Re: Why not op delete(void* v&,size_t);?
By: David Vandevoorde on Sun, 01 Oct 1995 05:39

Re: overloading and WP
By: Andrew Koenig on Sat, 30 Sep 1995 19:09

Re: Static objects initialization before main()
By: John Max Skaller on Sat, 30 Sep 1995 19:07

Re: Why not op delete(void* v&,size_t);?
By: Ronald F. Guilmette on Sat, 30 Sep 1995 19:04

Re: Integral promotion
By: Fergus Henderson on Sat, 30 Sep 1995 14:38

Re: auto_ptr: :reset and auto_ptr::operator=
By: Fergus Henderson on Sat, 30 Sep 1995 14:03

Templated constructors
By: Ben Werther on Fri, 29 Sep 1995 16:06

Re: Integral promotion
By: Steve Clamage on Fri, 29 Sep 1995 15:21

Re: try blocks & compound statements
By: J. Kanze on Fri, 29 Sep 1995 15:21

Re: object contruction/destruction in c++, des
By: Steve Clamage on Fri, 29 Sep 1995 17:26

object contruction/destruction in c++, design flaw?
By: Henk Kampman on Fri, 29 Sep 1995 16:26

overloading and WP
By: Anil Vijendran on Fri, 29 Sep 1995 16:24

Re: virtual overload differing in return type only?
By: John Barton on Sat, 30 Sep 1995 13:10

Re: Making STL user-friendly?? [Re: STL find errorprone]
By: John Max Skaller on Sat, 30 Sep 1995 13:06

STL Traps and Pitfalls wanted
By: Cay Horstmann on Sat, 30 Sep 1995 13:00

Re: Static objects initialization before main()
By: Pulkkinen Esa on Sat, 30 Sep 1995 11:04

Re: Inheritance and references to pointers
By: Jean-Rene Bouvier on Thu, 28 Sep 1995 18:05

try blocks & compound statements
By: Tim on Thu, 28 Sep 1995 17:19

Re: Making STL user-friendly?? [Re: STL find errorprone]
By: Fabrice Clerc on Thu, 28 Sep 1995 17:17

Restricting access with access/using declarations
By: John Lacey on Thu, 28 Sep 1995 17:16

references in overloaded functions
By: Dominique Marcadet on Thu, 28 Sep 1995 17:13

Re: Casts to reference
By: xavier on Thu, 28 Sep 1995 09:48

Re: Making STL user-friendly?? [Re: STL find errorprone]
By: Fabrice Clerc on Wed, 27 Sep 1995 15:25

Re: Scope of variables declared in if/while/for
By: Michael Cook on Wed, 27 Sep 1995 14:48

Re: Casts to reference
By: Steve Clamage on Wed, 27 Sep 1995 18:49

Re: virtual overload differing in return type only?
By: Jim Garrison on Wed, 27 Sep 1995 18:22

Re: Scope of variables declared in if/while/for
By: John Max Skaller on Wed, 27 Sep 1995 06:12

Re: Inheritance and references to pointers
By: John Max Skaller on Wed, 27 Sep 1995 06:12

Re: Inheritance and references to pointers
By: Sam Fenster on Wed, 27 Sep 1995 17:42

Re: typedef X;
By: Steve Clamage on Wed, 27 Sep 1995 17:41

Re: Scope of variables declared in if/while/for
By: rjl on Wed, 27 Sep 1995 17:40

Casts to reference
By: Bryan Boreham on Wed, 27 Sep 1995 16:54

Re: Making STL user-friendly?? [Re: STL find errorprone]
By: Mumit Khan on Tue, 26 Sep 1995 21:01

Re: Scope of variables declared in if/while/for
By: Joe Buck on Tue, 26 Sep 1995 20:26

Re: operator(s) << are member functions. Why?
By: Steve Clamage on Tue, 26 Sep 1995 15:59

operator(s) << are member functions. Why?
By: Martin Prange on Tue, 26 Sep 1995 15:13

Re: Inheritance and references to pointers
By: Alex Martelli on Tue, 26 Sep 1995 15:13

Re: Scope of variables declared in if/while/for
By: Herb Sutter on Tue, 26 Sep 1995 23:00

Re: Questions concerning initialization of nonlocals
By: Wesley E. Munsil on Tue, 26 Sep 1995 19:51

Output iterators
By: Dan Zigmond on Tue, 26 Sep 1995 19:50

Re: Questions concerning initialization of nonlocals
By: Ajay Kamdar on Tue, 26 Sep 1995 16:49

Re: typedef X;
By: andrewfg on Tue, 26 Sep 1995 16:48

Re: istream weirdness
By: kanze on Tue, 26 Sep 1995 15:26

Questions concerning initialization of nonlocals
By: Wesley E. Munsil on Mon, 25 Sep 1995 21:19

Re: Inheritance and references to pointers
By: Andrew Koenig on Tue, 26 Sep 1995 06:53

Re: Scope of variables declared in if/whil
By: Steve Clamage on Mon, 25 Sep 1995 22:31

Re: Scope of variables declared in if/while/for
By: Herb Sutter on Mon, 25 Sep 1995 22:18

Re: Scope of variables declared in if/while/for
By: Matt Austern on Mon, 25 Sep 1995 20:43

Re: istream weirdness
By: Steve Clamage on Mon, 25 Sep 1995 17:39

Scope of variables declared in if/while/for
By: Robert Martin on Mon, 25 Sep 1995 16:56

Re: typename versus typedef (was Re: typedef X;)
By: Alex Martelli on Mon, 25 Sep 1995 17:26

Re: Making STL user-friendly?? [Re: STL find errorprone]
By: kanze on Mon, 25 Sep 1995 15:45

Inheritance and references to pointers
By: Jean-Rene Bouvier on Mon, 25 Sep 1995 07:25

Re: sort algo and list<T> [Re: STL find errorprone]
By: John Max Skaller on Mon, 25 Sep 1995 04:14

istream weirdness
By: Robin Rowe on Mon, 25 Sep 1995 02:02

Re: Making STL user-friendly?? [Re: STL find errorprone]
By: John Max Skaller on Mon, 25 Sep 1995 01:59

Re: typename versus typedef (was Re: typedef X;)
By: Andrew Koenig on Mon, 25 Sep 1995 02:04

Re: Template member function specializations
By: Mumit Khan on Sun, 24 Sep 1995 20:24

Re: Proposal for a new access specifier
By: Alex Martelli on Sun, 24 Sep 1995 19:23

Re: Source for the WP
By: Jason Merrill on Sun, 24 Sep 1995 06:04

Re: typedef X;
By: Jason Merrill on Sun, 24 Sep 1995 06:04

Re: Pascal-like 'with' statement feasible in C++?
By: Tom Payne on Sun, 24 Sep 1995 06:04

auto_ptr
By: Frode Nilsen on Sun, 24 Sep 1995 06:04

Re: virtual overload differing in return type only?
By: Steve Clamage on Sun, 24 Sep 1995 08:19

Re: Source for the WP
By: David Vandevoorde on Sat, 23 Sep 1995 23:59

Re: Making STL user-friendly?? [Re: STL find errorprone]
By: Alex Martelli on Sat, 23 Sep 1995 20:57

typename versus typedef (was Re: typedef X;)
By: Alex Martelli on Sat, 23 Sep 1995 20:54

auto_ptr
By: Frode Nilsen on Fri, 22 Sep 1995 15:13

Re: Partial Template Specialization
By: Gene Linetsky on Sat, 23 Sep 1995 16:09

members of const objects
By: Integrated Software Inc. on Sat, 23 Sep 1995 16:07

Proposal for a new access specifier
By: Juan Carlos Rodriguez on Sat, 23 Sep 1995 16:06

virtual overload differing in return type only?
By: Jim Garrison on Sat, 23 Sep 1995 16:02

Re: STL and user-friendliness
By: Christopher Thames on Fri, 22 Sep 1995 16:10

Re: STL and user-friendliness
By: Christopher Thames on Fri, 22 Sep 1995 17:43

Re: Making STL user-friendly?? [Re: STL find errorprone]
By: Mumit Khan on Fri, 22 Sep 1995 17:15

Re: auto_ptr::reset and auto_ptr::operator=
By: J. Kanze on Fri, 22 Sep 1995 17:13

Re: placement delete
By: J. Kanze on Fri, 22 Sep 1995 17:09

Re: Source for the WP
By: Steve Clamage on Thu, 21 Sep 1995 14:44

Source for the WP
By: Michael Thayer on Thu, 21 Sep 1995 03:49

Re: Making STL user-friendly?? [Re: STL find errorprone]
By: Tony Cook on Thu, 21 Sep 1995 05:44

Template member function specializations
By: Brian Glendenning on Wed, 20 Sep 1995 21:18

Re: typedef X;
By: Craig P. Forbes on Wed, 20 Sep 1995 20:53

Re: auto_ptr::reset and auto_ptr::operator=
By: Tony Davis on Wed, 20 Sep 1995 23:43

Re: Pascal-like 'with' statement feasible in C++?
By: Danny Bain on Wed, 20 Sep 1995 23:32

sort algo and list<T> [Re: STL find errorprone]
By: Mumit Khan on Wed, 20 Sep 1995 18:45

Re: Pascal-like 'with' statement feasible in C++?
By: Shankar Unni on Wed, 20 Sep 1995 18:43

Re: placement delete
By: Bill Gibbons on Wed, 20 Sep 1995 08:38

Re: Why aren't there not-necessarily-unwinding exceptions a la VMS?
By: Dag Bruck on Wed, 20 Sep 1995 08:05

Re: overload resolution
By: Nathan Myers on Wed, 20 Sep 1995 03:08

Re: Why aren't there not-necessarily-unwinding
By: Steve Clamage on Wed, 20 Sep 1995 03:31

Re: auto_ptr::reset and auto_ptr::operator=
By: Tony Davis on Mon, 18 Sep 1995 20:16

overload resolution
By: Christian E. Hopps on Mon, 18 Sep 1995 19:42

Re: STL is Standard C++ Library? I don't think so.
By: J. Kanze on Mon, 18 Sep 1995 14:59

Re: Pascal-like 'with' statement feasible in C++?
By: Kevin Lentin on Mon, 18 Sep 1995 14:59

Re: placement delete
By: Sam Fenster on Tue, 19 Sep 1995 01:33

placement delete
By: Robert Martin on Mon, 18 Sep 1995 21:31

Re: typedef X;
By: Etay Bogner on Sun, 17 Sep 1995 17:05

"new" expressions
By: David White on Sun, 17 Sep 1995 15:30

Re: Do we need a standard isPointer() function?
By: J. Kanze on Mon, 18 Sep 1995 09:23

Nested Classes?
By: Laszlo Vecsey on Mon, 18 Sep 1995 07:19

Re: Why not op delete(void* v&,size_t);?
By: Alex Martelli on Sat, 16 Sep 1995 14:52

typedef X;
By: Haim Kreitman on Sun, 17 Sep 1995 03:44

Re: Pascal-like 'with' statement feasible in C++?
By: David Chase on Sat, 16 Sep 1995 17:42

Re: Pascal-like 'with' statement feasible
By: Steve Clamage on Sat, 16 Sep 1995 17:42

Re: Pascal-like 'with' statement feasible in C++?
By: Larry Hunter on Sat, 16 Sep 1995 08:23

Re: Partial Template Specialization
By: Steve Clamage on Fri, 15 Sep 1995 22:49

Partial Template Specialization
By: Martin Hitz on Fri, 15 Sep 1995 22:21

Re: Making STL user-friendly?? [Re: STL find errorprone]
By: Fabrice Clerc on Fri, 15 Sep 1995 15:22

Re: Implementing auto_ptr + type of operator->*
By: Ulf Schuenemann on Fri, 15 Sep 1995 15:22

Re: Pascal-like 'with' statement feasible in C++?
By: Lionel Moser on Fri, 15 Sep 1995 13:48

Re: Do we need a standard isPointer() function?
By: Fergus Henderson on Thu, 14 Sep 1995 22:26

Re: Making STL user-friendly?? [Re: STL find errorprone]
By: Bernd Eggink on Thu, 14 Sep 1995 17:30

Re: new and delete
By: David Wald on Thu, 14 Sep 1995 17:29

Pascal-like 'with' statement feasible in C++?
By: Eugene Radchenko on Thu, 14 Sep 1995 17:28

Do we need a standard isPointer() function?
By: Pablo Halpern on Thu, 14 Sep 1995 16:49

STL and user-friendliness
By: William McIlhagga on Thu, 14 Sep 1995 14:59

Re: new and delete
By: Steve Clamage on Thu, 14 Sep 1995 14:59