🚀 go-pugleaf

Standard identification of compilers?
By: David S. Masterson on Mon, 06 May 1991 16:57

Re: "module" facility for top-level namespace control
By: Robert Krajewski on Fri, 03 May 1991 18:57

Re: Creeping feature #769: `new auto'
By: David Chase on Thu, 02 May 1991 22:47

Creeping feature #769: `new auto'
By: Scott Layson Burson on Thu, 02 May 1991 07:49

Re: "module" facility for top-level namespace control
By: Patrick C Beard on Thu, 02 May 1991 06:27

Re: "module" facility for top-level namespace control
By: Scott Layson Burson on Wed, 01 May 1991 19:26

Re: backward virtual function call
By: Andrew Koenig on Tue, 30 Apr 1991 21:15

Re: "module" facility for top-level namespace control
By: Scott Layson Burson on Tue, 30 Apr 1991 20:23

Re: Proposed: "closures"
By: Scott Layson Burson on Tue, 30 Apr 1991 20:15

Re: backward virtual function call
By: William M Miller on Tue, 30 Apr 1991 14:03

Re: "module" facility for top-level namespace control
By: Reid Ellis on Mon, 29 Apr 1991 17:40

backward virtual function call
By: Martin Hitz on Tue, 30 Apr 1991 02:40

Re: "module" facility for top-level namespace control
By: Jim ADCOCK on Mon, 22 Apr 1991 22:35

Re: "module" facility for top-level namespace control
By: Peter GOLDE on Mon, 22 Apr 1991 20:50

Re: "module" facility for top-level namespace control
By: William M Miller on Sun, 28 Apr 1991 23:15

Re: Proposed: "closures"
By: William M Miller on Sun, 28 Apr 1991 23:13

Re: Assignment operators return lvalues / classes and types
By: Reid Ellis on Sat, 27 Apr 1991 16:19

Re: "module" facility for top-level namespace control
By: Scott Layson Burson on Sun, 28 Apr 1991 01:36

Re: Assignment operators return lvalues / classes and types
By: Scott Layson Burson on Sun, 28 Apr 1991 01:18

Idea for optimized copy functions
By: Jan-Pieter Cornet on Sat, 27 Apr 1991 11:58

Re: "module" facility for top-level namespace control
By: Niklas Hallqvist on Sat, 27 Apr 1991 04:20

Re: "module" facility for top-level namespace control
By: Reid Ellis on Sat, 27 Apr 1991 06:18

Re: "module" facility for top-level namespace control
By: Ron Guilmette on Sat, 27 Apr 1991 01:41

Re: "module" facility for top-level namespace control
By: Ron Guilmette on Sat, 27 Apr 1991 00:35

Re: "module" facility for top-level namespace control
By: Ken Raeburn on Fri, 26 Apr 1991 20:57

Re: Proposed: "closures"
By: Scott Layson Burson on Fri, 26 Apr 1991 02:33

Re: Proposed: "closures"
By: Benjamin Schreiber on Tue, 23 Apr 1991 03:22

Re: "module" facility for top-level namespace control
By: Reid Ellis on Thu, 25 Apr 1991 06:07

Re: Assignment operators return lvalues / classes and types
By: Martin Hitz on Thu, 25 Apr 1991 03:00

Re: protected derivation
By: [Doug Landauer] on Wed, 24 Apr 1991 20:42

Re: Assignment operators return lvalues / classes and types
By: Scott Layson Burson on Wed, 24 Apr 1991 18:40

Re: "module" facility for top-level namespace control
By: Scott Layson Burson on Wed, 24 Apr 1991 10:07

Re: What is int &volatile r; [Was: What is int &const r;]
By: Mike Banahan on Mon, 22 Apr 1991 18:48

Re: "module" facility for top-level namespace control
By: Robert Krajewski on Tue, 23 Apr 1991 21:39

protected derivation
By: Martin Hitz on Tue, 23 Apr 1991 03:05

Re: "module" facility for top-level namespace control
By: William M Miller on Tue, 23 Apr 1991 03:03

Assignment operators return lvalues -- why?
By: J. Stephen Adamczyk on Mon, 22 Apr 1991 22:06

Re: "module" facility for top-level namespace control
By: Niklas Hallqvist on Sun, 21 Apr 1991 13:27

Re: "module" facility for top-level namespace control
By: Ron Guilmette on Sun, 21 Apr 1991 23:53

Re: "module" facility for top-level namespace control
By: Dag Bruck on Sun, 21 Apr 1991 17:27

Re: "module" facility for top-level namespace control
By: Cay Horstmann on Sun, 21 Apr 1991 15:44

Re: "module" facility for top-level namespace control
By: Scott Layson Burson on Sun, 21 Apr 1991 01:47

Re: "module" facility for top-level namespace control
By: Ron Guilmette on Sat, 20 Apr 1991 07:48

Re: "module" facility for top-level namespace control
By: David Cok on Fri, 19 Apr 1991 18:39

"module" facility for top-level namespace control
By: Scott Layson Burson on Fri, 19 Apr 1991 16:32

archives for comp.std.c++? (also: hello out there?)
By: Scott Layson Burson on Fri, 19 Apr 1991 11:53

Pure functions and derived classes
By: richard henderson~ on Thu, 18 Apr 1991 23:37

chess programs in c++
By: Menting B L on Wed, 17 Apr 1991 19:27

What is int &volatile r; [Was: What is int &const r;]
By: Tom Ngo on Thu, 18 Apr 1991 02:42

Re: What is "int &const r"?
By: Harald Fuchs on Tue, 16 Apr 1991 16:06

What is "int &const r"?
By: Tom Ngo on Tue, 16 Apr 1991 03:37

Usability of pointers to members and MI (was: Proposed: "closures")
By: Niklas Hallqvist on Sun, 14 Apr 1991 12:25

Re: operator dot?
By: Jim ADCOCK on Tue, 02 Apr 1991 22:37

Re: parsing C++ woes: a puzzle
By: Jan GRAY on Tue, 09 Apr 1991 00:05

handling of return values
By: Mark Grand on Sat, 13 Apr 1991 19:47

Re: Proposed: "closures"
By: Scott Layson Burson on Sat, 13 Apr 1991 08:07

Re: Proposed: "closures"
By: David Chase on Fri, 12 Apr 1991 20:03

Proposed: "closures"
By: Gyro on Fri, 12 Apr 1991 08:15

RE: overloading templates
By: Michael J. Vilot on Wed, 10 Apr 1991 11:43

Initialization ambiguities
By: jimc on Wed, 10 Apr 1991 19:02

Re: c++ books, help!
By: Michael Phillips on Wed, 10 Apr 1991 13:29

Re: c++ books, help!
By: Nick Jacobs on Tue, 09 Apr 1991 19:44

c++ books, help!
By: 2fmnsting on Tue, 09 Apr 1991 17:15

Re: type definitions and scopes
By: David Michaels on Thu, 04 Apr 1991 20:12

overloading templates
By: David Cok on Thu, 04 Apr 1991 11:45

overloading the class assignment operator
By: Buz Owen on Mon, 01 Apr 1991 22:24

Re: type definitions and scopes
By: Daniel Edelson on Mon, 01 Apr 1991 23:35

type definitions and scopes
By: Daniel Edelson on Mon, 01 Apr 1991 23:30

Return type of operator->()
By: Glen Ditchfield on Mon, 01 Apr 1991 16:23

Re: Constructor can subvert constness
By: Reid Ellis on Mon, 01 Apr 1991 06:04

Re: Objects already contain type information => binary virtual functions
By: Chip Salzenberg on Sun, 31 Mar 1991 19:47

Re: X3j16 "contractions"
By: Daniel Edelson on Sun, 31 Mar 1991 22:14

Re: X3j16 "contractions"
By: Cay Horstmann on Sun, 31 Mar 1991 16:46

Re: Errata list for ARM
By: Kevin S. White on Sun, 31 Mar 1991 18:59

Re: Compiled templates?
By: Ari Juhani Huttunen on Sat, 30 Mar 1991 13:23

Re: X3j16 "contractions"
By: William M Miller on Sat, 30 Mar 1991 16:30

Re: X3j16 "contractions"
By: Jeremy Grodberg on Sat, 30 Mar 1991 06:59

Re: Compiled templates?
By: Tony L. Hansen on Fri, 29 Mar 1991 18:49

Compiled templates?
By: Ari Juhani Huttunen on Fri, 29 Mar 1991 13:38

Re: implicit type conversions considered harmful: X3j16 "contractions" WG
By: Niklas Hallqvist on Wed, 27 Mar 1991 22:06

Objects already contain type information => binary virtual functions
By: Tom Ngo on Thu, 28 Mar 1991 14:36

Re: Conversions to/from void*, redux
By: Jim ADCOCK on Wed, 27 Mar 1991 18:40

Re: type/member tags
By: Chip Salzenberg on Wed, 27 Mar 1991 18:40

Re: protected != public-to-derived
By: Scott Layson Burson on Wed, 27 Mar 1991 08:44

Re: protected != public-to-derived
By: Scott Layson Burson on Wed, 27 Mar 1991 08:36

Pointer arguments for overloaded operators
By: Alan Teague on Tue, 26 Mar 1991 18:27

Re: protected != public-to-derived
By: Jim ADCOCK on Tue, 26 Mar 1991 19:48

Re: protected != public-to-derived
By: William M Miller on Tue, 26 Mar 1991 23:15

Shadowing of base class functions with other arguments
By: David G. Wonnacott on Tue, 26 Mar 1991 20:56

Re: protected != public-to-derived
By: Scott Layson Burson on Tue, 26 Mar 1991 06:07

Re: protected != public-to-derived
By: Dave Scidmore on Tue, 26 Mar 1991 02:40

Re: protected != public-to-derived
By: Dave Scidmore on Sun, 24 Mar 1991 07:02

Final draft of ~const proposal (2.2)
By: Tom Ngo on Tue, 26 Mar 1991 03:41

Re: X3j16 "contractions" WG; pointers to members considered redundant
By: William M Miller on Tue, 26 Mar 1991 02:13

Re: implicit type conversions considered harmful: X3j16 "contractions" WG
By: David Cok on Tue, 26 Mar 1991 01:30

Re: protected != public-to-derived
By: William M Miller on Mon, 25 Mar 1991 21:06

Re: X3j16 "contractions" WG; pointers to members considered redundant
By: Scott Layson on Mon, 25 Mar 1991 19:05

Re: protected != public-to-derived
By: Scott Layson on Mon, 25 Mar 1991 18:36

Re: implicit type conversions considered harmful: X3j16 "contractions" WG
By: Tom Horsley on Mon, 25 Mar 1991 17:32

Re: Constructor can subvert constness (was ~const)
By: Paul Vaughan on Mon, 25 Mar 1991 15:41

implicit type conversions considered harmful: X3j16 "contractions" WG
By: Ron Guilmette on Mon, 25 Mar 1991 09:10

Re: operator dot?
By: Ron Guilmette on Mon, 25 Mar 1991 08:11

Re: type/member tags
By: Ron Guilmette on Mon, 25 Mar 1991 08:04

C++ style guide
By: Richard Emberson on Sun, 24 Mar 1991 19:01

Re: protected != public-to-derived
By: William M Miller on Sun, 24 Mar 1991 20:51

Re: protected != public-to-derived
By: Scott Layson on Sun, 24 Mar 1991 01:04

Re: Errata list for ARM
By: David S. Masterson on Wed, 20 Mar 1991 21:45

Re: Tags, typecodes, experience with these things.
By: Jim ADCOCK on Fri, 22 Mar 1991 18:35

Re: protected != public-to-derived
By: David S. Masterson on Fri, 22 Mar 1991 22:54

Constructor can subvert constness (was ~const)
By: Tom Ngo on Fri, 22 Mar 1991 03:22

Re: Conversions to/from void*, redux
By: Chip Salzenberg on Wed, 20 Mar 1991 13:38

protected != public-to-derived
By: Bill Duttweiler on Tue, 19 Mar 1991 16:53

Errata list for ARM
By: "Eric Schweitz" on Tue, 19 Mar 1991 20:04

Dynamic Type checking and Exception Handling (was: Re: type/member tags)
By: Desmond Dsouza on Tue, 19 Mar 1991 04:35

Re: Conversions to/from void*, redux
By: Jim ADCOCK on Tue, 19 Mar 1991 01:23

Re: Tags, typecodes, experience with these things.
By: David Chase on Mon, 18 Mar 1991 20:39

Re: Tags, typecodes, experience with these things.
By: Jim ADCOCK on Fri, 15 Mar 1991 00:39

Re: Conversions to/from void*, redux
By: Chip Salzenberg on Fri, 15 Mar 1991 01:07

Re: Conversions to/from void*, redux
By: Chip Salzenberg on Fri, 15 Mar 1991 00:47

Re: operator dot?
By: Joe Buck on Sat, 16 Mar 1991 00:15

Re: overloading vs. virtual functions
By: Chip Salzenberg on Wed, 27 Feb 1991 22:34

Re: type/member tags (was Re: asking an object for its type)
By: Chip Salzenberg on Wed, 27 Feb 1991 22:26

Default copy constructor not making a copy
By: Michael Klein on Mon, 25 Feb 1991 19:56

Re: type/member tags
By: Chip Salzenberg on Tue, 12 Mar 1991 17:56

Re: parsing C++ woes
By: Peter Moore on Tue, 12 Mar 1991 22:05

Tags, typecodes, experience with these things.
By: David Chase on Tue, 12 Mar 1991 19:30

Re: Conversions to/from void*, redux
By: Jim ADCOCK on Mon, 11 Mar 1991 23:58

Re: template base classes
By: Jim ADCOCK on Mon, 11 Mar 1991 23:32