🚀 go-pugleaf

Re: possible extension -- typeof(expr)
By: Pablo Halpern on Fri, 08 Mar 1996 16:23

tellp and seekp on ofstream in separate runs?
By: Axel Thimm on Fri, 08 Mar 1996 16:22

Re: #endif //
By: Steve Clamage on Wed, 06 Mar 1996 21:56

Re: possible extension -- typeof(expr)
By: Jason Merrill on Wed, 06 Mar 1996 21:45

String header help???
By: Bob White on Fri, 08 Mar 1996 02:03

typename?
By: Steve Willer on Fri, 08 Mar 1996 02:10

Re: 'const' in header files
By: yeager on Fri, 08 Mar 1996 03:53

Re: typename?
By: Matt Austern on Fri, 08 Mar 1996 03:23

Re: no operator bool()?
By: Nathan Myers, http://www.cantrip... on Fri, 08 Mar 1996 02:04

delete or delete[] ???
By: David Sachs on Thu, 07 Mar 1996 23:22

Re: 'const' in header files
By: Steve Clamage on Thu, 07 Mar 1996 17:23

Re: 'const' in header files
By: Lars Farm on Thu, 07 Mar 1996 15:44

Re: Some ideas about C++ and a question
By: Zefram on Thu, 07 Mar 1996 15:44

Re: Streams and eof()
By: Steve Clamage on Thu, 07 Mar 1996 13:40

#endif //
By: Michael Cook on Wed, 06 Mar 1996 20:51

auto_ptr: no operator bool()?
By: Steve Willer on Wed, 06 Mar 1996 19:30

Re: Streams and eof()
By: James Kanze US/ESC 60/3/141 #407... on Wed, 06 Mar 1996 18:41

possible extension -- typeof(expr)
By: Tim Boemker on Wed, 06 Mar 1996 18:13

Re: Inialization and user-defined conversion
By: James Kanze US/ESC 60/3/141 #407... on Wed, 06 Mar 1996 18:06

Just auto_ptr?
By: Steve Willer on Wed, 06 Mar 1996 17:44

Re: Single-line comment and line continuation
By: James Kanze US/ESC 60/3/141 #407... on Wed, 06 Mar 1996 17:43

Re: constant-expression extension
By: James Kanze US/ESC 60/3/141 #407... on Wed, 06 Mar 1996 17:43

Re: Generic Object Callbacks
By: Robert B McInnis on Wed, 06 Mar 1996 17:40

Re: STL pop_back()
By: Wil Evers on Wed, 06 Mar 1996 15:44

Some ideas about C++ and a question
By: Valentin Bonnard on Sun, 03 Mar 1996 23:34

Re: constant-expression extension
By: David Vandevoorde on Sat, 02 Mar 1996 16:04

<fp.h> & double_t/float_t
By: Jay Zipnick on Sat, 02 Mar 1996 16:04

Re: Streams and eof()
By: Axel Thimm on Tue, 05 Mar 1996 17:40

Re: STL pop_back()
By: Dietmar Kuehl on Tue, 05 Mar 1996 17:50

Re: Some ideas about C++ and a question
By: James Kanze US/ESC 60/3/141 #407... on Tue, 05 Mar 1996 17:47

Re: Resolving public data
By: Steve Clamage on Tue, 05 Mar 1996 17:48

Re: STL pop_back()
By: James Kanze US/ESC 60/3/141 #407... on Tue, 05 Mar 1996 17:46

Inialization and user-defined conversion
By: Alexander Krotoff on Tue, 05 Mar 1996 17:45

Re: constant-expression extension
By: Igor Boukanov on Tue, 05 Mar 1996 17:44

Re: Hiding Overloaded Functions
By: Roman Lechtchinsky on Tue, 05 Mar 1996 17:42

Re: Single-line comment and line continuation
By: Tim Hollebeek on Tue, 05 Mar 1996 17:41

STL pop_back()
By: Hayden Schultz on Tue, 05 Mar 1996 07:58

Re: Standard String Library
By: Joe Buck on Tue, 05 Mar 1996 07:35

Re: constant-expression extension
By: Tom Payne on Tue, 05 Mar 1996 02:24

Re: Hiding Overloaded Functions
By: David Vandevoorde on Tue, 05 Mar 1996 02:22

Re: Generic Object Callbacks
By: ian (i.) willmott on Mon, 04 Mar 1996 20:32

Re: Single-line comment and line continuation
By: Steve Clamage on Mon, 04 Mar 1996 19:22

Re: constant-expression extension
By: J. Kanze on Mon, 04 Mar 1996 18:33

Standard String Library
By: rwolf on Mon, 04 Mar 1996 18:30

Re: Some ideas about C++ and a question
By: Steve Clamage on Mon, 04 Mar 1996 18:30

Re: Semantics of "new foo[0]"
By: Steve Nutt on Mon, 04 Mar 1996 18:25

Some ideas about C++ and a question
By: Valentin Bonnard on Mon, 04 Mar 1996 18:21

Hiding Overloaded Functions
By: Roman Lechtchinsky on Mon, 04 Mar 1996 18:20

Re: Streams and eof()
By: Steve Clamage on Mon, 04 Mar 1996 14:26

Re: wchar_t version of atof() and atoi()?
By: J. Kanze on Mon, 04 Mar 1996 12:49

Re: Streams and eof()
By: J. Kanze on Mon, 04 Mar 1996 12:47

Re: overriding functions a la Stroustrup allowed?
By: Steve Nutt on Sun, 03 Mar 1996 21:22

Re: Generic Object Callbacks
By: Rich Hickey on Sat, 02 Mar 1996 16:56

Re: 'const' in header files
By: John I. Moore, Jr. on Sat, 02 Mar 1996 01:39

Re: Generic Object Callbacks
By: linh (l.) dang on Fri, 01 Mar 1996 17:17

Re: An Extra Virtual Destructor Question t
By: Steve Clamage on Fri, 01 Mar 1996 17:13

Re: overriding functions a la Stroustrup allow
By: Steve Clamage on Fri, 01 Mar 1996 17:04

constant-expression extension
By: Igor Boukanov on Fri, 01 Mar 1996 17:03

Re: An Extra Virtual Destructor Question t
By: David Sachs on Fri, 01 Mar 1996 14:57

Re: operators new[]/delete[]
By: Tony Cook on Fri, 01 Mar 1996 14:55

Re: Generic Object Callbacks
By: Marco Dalla Gasperina on Fri, 01 Mar 1996 14:06

Re: Namespaces within class definition???
By: Steve Clamage on Fri, 01 Mar 1996 13:43

overriding functions a la Stroustrup allowed?
By: Rainer Fischer on Fri, 01 Mar 1996 13:42

Re: Calling X(int) from X()'s init list
By: David Bradley on Fri, 01 Mar 1996 12:28

Re: Generic Object Callbacks
By: ian (i.) willmott on Fri, 01 Mar 1996 03:25

Re: double& rd2 = 2.0; // error?
By: Steve Clamage on Thu, 29 Feb 1996 22:06

wchar_t version of atof() and atoi()?
By: Jamshid Afshar on Thu, 29 Feb 1996 18:49

Re: operators new[]/delete[]
By: Dietmar Kuehl on Thu, 29 Feb 1996 17:14

Re: Generic Object Callbacks
By: Shalom Reich on Thu, 29 Feb 1996 16:34

Re: Who gets out of memory exception?
By: J. Kanze on Thu, 29 Feb 1996 16:00

Re: Semantics of "new foo[0]"
By: Fergus Henderson on Thu, 29 Feb 1996 16:00

Re: operators new[]/delete[]
By: Pablo Halpern on Thu, 29 Feb 1996 06:15

Re: An Extra Virtual Destructor Question t
By: Steve Clamage on Thu, 29 Feb 1996 06:18

Re: Namespaces within class definition???
By: Bob White on Thu, 29 Feb 1996 06:23

Who gets out of memory exception?
By: Tom Horsley on Wed, 28 Feb 1996 21:18

Re: Namespaces within class definition???
By: Steve Clamage on Wed, 28 Feb 1996 21:14

Re: 'const' in header files
By: Steve Clamage on Wed, 28 Feb 1996 20:46

Namespaces within class definition???
By: Bob White on Wed, 28 Feb 1996 18:55

'const' in header files
By: Lars Farm on Wed, 28 Feb 1996 18:47

Re: An Extra Virtual Destructor Question to Ponder
By: Wim Veldhuis on Wed, 28 Feb 1996 18:18

Re: Semantics of "new foo[0]"
By: Dietmar Kuehl on Wed, 28 Feb 1996 18:07

Re: const_cast
By: Fergus Henderson on Wed, 28 Feb 1996 17:34

Re: Is dynamic_cast safe?
By: Tony Cook on Wed, 28 Feb 1996 17:30

Re: Semantics of "new foo[0]"
By: Steve Clamage on Wed, 28 Feb 1996 16:16

Re: Calling X(int) from X()'s init list
By: Etay Bogner on Wed, 28 Feb 1996 16:16

Re: Semantics of "new foo[0]"
By: Alexandre Oliva on Wed, 28 Feb 1996 16:16

Re: Generic Object Callbacks
By: Ben Jones on Wed, 28 Feb 1996 14:57

Re: Is dynamic_cast safe?
By: Fergus Henderson on Wed, 28 Feb 1996 14:56

Re: Is dynamic_cast safe?
By: Steve Clamage on Wed, 28 Feb 1996 01:52

Re: Q: default constructor for fundamental types?
By: Fergus Henderson on Wed, 28 Feb 1996 07:25

Re: Tiny but embarassing typos in standard..
By: Andrew Koenig on Tue, 27 Feb 1996 22:37

Re: Q: default constructor for fundamental types?
By: Jamshid Afshar on Wed, 28 Feb 1996 01:14

Re: Is this legal?
By: David Byrden on Wed, 28 Feb 1996 00:17

Semantics of "new foo[0]"
By: G. Mike Butler D054 on Tue, 27 Feb 1996 23:13

Base class access specifiers
By: Nathan Sidwell on Tue, 27 Feb 1996 18:54

Re: Generic Object Callbacks
By: David Byrden on Tue, 27 Feb 1996 18:48

Re: Destruction of singletons
By: James Kanze US/ESC 60/3/141 #407... on Tue, 27 Feb 1996 18:45

Re: Calling X(int) from X()'s init list
By: Etay Bogner on Tue, 27 Feb 1996 18:41

Re: Q: default constructor for fundamental types?
By: Alexandre Oliva on Tue, 27 Feb 1996 18:40

Re: Calling X(int) from X()'s init list
By: Alexandre Oliva on Tue, 27 Feb 1996 18:39

Re: The realloc question: rationale?
By: David Vandevoorde on Tue, 27 Feb 1996 18:38

Is dynamic_cast safe?
By: Lars Farm on Tue, 27 Feb 1996 16:01

Re: Q: default constructor for fundamental types?
By: James Kanze US/ESC 60/3/141 #407... on Tue, 27 Feb 1996 16:01

Re: Generic Object Callbacks
By: Anders Lindback on Tue, 27 Feb 1996 16:01

Re: operators new[]/delete[]
By: Fergus Henderson on Tue, 27 Feb 1996 07:29

Re: Destruction of singletons
By: Jamshid Afshar on Tue, 27 Feb 1996 02:08

Is this legal?
By: Ken Rice on Tue, 27 Feb 1996 02:07

Re: Q: default constructor for fundamental types?
By: Harlan Messinger on Mon, 26 Feb 1996 20:13

Re: The realloc question: rationale?
By: Joe Buck on Mon, 26 Feb 1996 20:13

Re: Destruction of singletons
By: James Kanze US/ESC 60/3/141 #407... on Mon, 26 Feb 1996 19:50

Re: The realloc question: rationale?
By: James Kanze US/ESC 60/3/141 #407... on Mon, 26 Feb 1996 19:48

Re: OSTRSTREAM and sizing
By: James Kanze US/ESC 60/3/141 #407... on Mon, 26 Feb 1996 19:49

Re: Proposal: Reconcile Inheritance and Inlining
By: Rich Hickey on Mon, 26 Feb 1996 17:35

Re: Calling X(int) from X()'s init list
By: Harald Fuchs on Mon, 26 Feb 1996 17:23

const_cast
By: John E. Potter on Mon, 26 Feb 1996 17:33

Re: Calling X(int) from X()'s init list
By: Steve Clamage on Mon, 26 Feb 1996 17:39

Re: Portability. Modules. WAS: RE: Are all Windows programs
By: Jonathan de Boyne Pollard on Mon, 26 Feb 1996 17:38

Tiny but embarassing typos in standard..
By: David Byrden on Mon, 26 Feb 1996 17:30

Q: default constructor for fundamental types?
By: Dirk Herrmann on Mon, 26 Feb 1996 17:24

Re: Calling X(int) from X()'s init list
By: Anders Lindback on Mon, 26 Feb 1996 16:07

Re: Generic Object Callbacks
By: brian (b.c.) white on Mon, 26 Feb 1996 16:07

operators new[]/delete[]
By: Constantine Antonovich: on Mon, 26 Feb 1996 16:07

"explicit" keyword now banned by the Communications Decency Act..
By: David Byrden on Mon, 26 Feb 1996 01:33

Re: The realloc question: rationale?
By: David Vandevoorde on Mon, 26 Feb 1996 01:33

Re: Tiny but embarassing typo in standard
By: Andrew Koenig on Sun, 25 Feb 1996 16:45

Re: The realloc question: rationale?
By: Kerry Kimbrough on Sun, 25 Feb 1996 16:44

Re: Calling X(int) from X()'s init list
By: David Byrden on Sun, 25 Feb 1996 16:44

Returning void
By: bs on Sun, 25 Feb 1996 16:44