Re: Re: Is `char const *foo;' legal?

Article View: comp.std.c

Article #1069

#1069

From: Ron Guilmette
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 1990 02:57

13 lines
856 bytes

In article <12570037@hpclwjm.HP.COM> walter@hpclwjm.HP.COM (Walter Murray) writes:
>[Regarding a declaration like "const char bar[]"]
...
>Here are relevant sections from the Standard (quoting from the 12/7/88
>draft):
>
>The type of an array is defined by 3.5.4.2, page 68, lines 6-10.
>The inductive method used to define the type of a derived declarator
>can be a little confusing...

Yowza!

// rfg

Technical Details

Message-ID: <25AFEAB4.14235@paris.ics.uci.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!usc!orion.oac.uci.edu!uci-ics!rfg

References: <MEISSNER.90Jan11104148@pmax27.osf.org> <12570037@hpclwjm.HP.COM>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!usc!orion.oac.uci.edu!uci-ics!rfg
From: rfg@ics.uci.edu (Ron Guilmette)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Re: Re: Is `char const *foo;' legal?
Message-ID: <25AFEAB4.14235@paris.ics.uci.edu>
Date: 14 Jan 90 02:57:55 GMT
References: <MEISSNER.90Jan11104148@pmax27.osf.org> <12570037@hpclwjm.HP.COM>
Reply-To: rfg@ics.uci.edu (Ron Guilmette)
Organization: UC Irvine Department of ICS
Lines: 13

Reply to Parent Message