Re: X3J11 interpretations (unofficial)

Article View: comp.std.c

Article #1131

#1131

From: Richard Tobin
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 1990 18:10

16 lines
1172 bytes

In article <12547@smoke.BRL.MIL> gwyn@smoke.BRL.MIL (Doug Gwyn) writes:
>Meanwhile the Brits and Danes are reported to have been circulating
>draft documents to a selected subset of WG14, excluding comment from
>those who know what is wrong with their ideas.

Could someone tell us a bit more about what's going on here?  If I had
realised that there was significant disagreement between BSI and ANSI,
I might have gone to some BSI meetings, but unfortunately I didn't.

Anyone from BSI out there to put the other point of view?

-- Richard
-- 
Richard Tobin,                       JANET: R.Tobin@uk.ac.ed             
AI Applications Institute,           ARPA:  R.Tobin%uk.ac.ed@nsfnet-relay.ac.uk
Edinburgh University.                UUCP:  ...!ukc!ed.ac.uk!R.Tobin

Technical Details

Message-ID: <2192@skye.ed.ac.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcsun!ukc!edcastle!aiai!richard

References: <12547@smoke.BRL.MIL>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcsun!ukc!edcastle!aiai!richard
From: richard@aiai.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Re: X3J11 interpretations (unofficial)
Message-ID: <2192@skye.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 10 Apr 90 18:10:53 GMT
References: <12547@smoke.BRL.MIL>
Reply-To: richard@aiai.UUCP (Richard Tobin)
Organization: AIAI, University of Edinburgh, Scotland
Lines: 16

Reply to Parent Message