Article View: comp.std.c
Article #1245Re: int const * p;
From: John F. Woods
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 1992 19:09
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 1992 19:09
13 lines
872 bytes
872 bytes
linden@positive.Eng.Sun.COM (Peter van der Linden) writes: >John omitted only the reference to the manual, namely >section 3.5.3 "Type Qualifiers". It's not clear why a >meaningful construct, like a constant pointer to a constant value >is precluded. That construct isn't precluded; const int * const a; is OK. That declaration has two separate qualifier lists: one associated with the type (int *) and one associated with the variable, essentially separated by the *.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<15459@ksr.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!world!ksr!jfwReferences:
<180188INNmtc@fbi-news.Informatik.Uni-Dortmund.DE> <181tsmINN8uh@fbi-news.Informatik.Uni-Dortmund.DE> <15441@ksr.com> <la9uonINNp9m@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!world!ksr!jfw From: jfw@ksr.com (John F. Woods) Newsgroups: comp.std.c Subject: Re: int const * p; Message-ID: <15459@ksr.com> Date: 2 Sep 92 15:09:25 EDT References: <180188INNmtc@fbi-news.Informatik.Uni-Dortmund.DE> <181tsmINN8uh@fbi-news.Informatik.Uni-Dortmund.DE> <15441@ksr.com> <la9uonINNp9m@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM> Sender: news@ksr.com Lines: 13