🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Aug7.001510.13418@mri.com> woolsey@mri.com (Jeff Woolsey) writes:
> Basically, is the following module legal?
> #define it 1,2
> #define that(a,b) a+b
> void f(void) {
>	that(it);
>	}
> I've been reading the standard all afternoon looking for supporting
> evidence one way or the other on this one, and have been unable to
> convince myself of the disposition of this code fragment (reading the
> standard is usually like this, but eventually something falls out
> and settles it).

Section 6.8.3 Constraints is perfectly clear - the number of arguments
must match the #define.

-- 
Clive D.W. Feather     | IXI Limited         | If you lie to the compiler,
clive@x.co.uk          | 62-74 Burleigh St.  | it will get its revenge.
Phone: +44 223 462 131 | Cambridge   CB1 1OJ |   - Henry Spencer
Fax:   +44 223 462 132 | United Kingdom      |