ANSI C grammar

Article View: comp.std.c

Article #1371

#1371

From: Mark Hjelm
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 1990 15:50

16 lines
1075 bytes

Now that there is a real standard, are there any significant changes
to the grammars in K&R II or Harbison/Steele II (or to the language
specification in general, for that matter)?  Assuming I translate them
directly into a YACC source file, is there any reason to choose one
over the other?  I don't have a copy of the standard yet.  I assume it
has a grammar specification.  Is it similar to (the same as) one of
these two?  Lastly, has anyone produced an up-to-date YACC grammar
(and LEX scanner) already?  If so, please post it or send e-mail.  I
have one that was posted several years ago that I will modify, if
there isn't anything more recent.


Thanks,
Mark Hjelm

hjelm@cs.cmu.edu

Technical Details

Message-ID: <9515@pt.cs.cmu.edu>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!pt.cs.cmu.edu!g.gp.cs.cmu.edu!hjelm

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!pt.cs.cmu.edu!g.gp.cs.cmu.edu!hjelm
From: hjelm@g.gp.cs.cmu.edu (Mark Hjelm)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c,comp.lang.c
Subject: ANSI C grammar
Keywords: ansi c grammar
Message-ID: <9515@pt.cs.cmu.edu>
Date: 4 Jun 90 15:50:51 GMT
Organization: Carnegie-Mellon University, CS/RI
Lines: 16