Re: Why use "declarator" in "function definition"?

Article View: comp.std.c

Article #1443

#1443

From: Walter Murray
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 1990 20:32

13 lines
648 bytes

Glen Ditchfield writes:

> 	typedef void Process(void);
> 	Process thunk {
> 	    /* do something */
> 	}

>    So, is the above code proper ANSI C?  

No.  See footnote 79 on page 82.

Walter Murray
----------

Technical Details

Message-ID: <16490023@hpcllca.HP.COM>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!hp-pcd!hplabs!hpcc01!hpcuhb!hpcllla!hpcllca!walter

References: <1990Jun21.183931.21226@watmath.waterloo.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!hp-pcd!hplabs!hpcc01!hpcuhb!hpcllla!hpcllca!walter
From: walter@hpcllca.HP.COM (Walter Murray)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Re: Why use "declarator" in "function definition"?
Message-ID: <16490023@hpcllca.HP.COM>
Date: 26 Jun 90 20:32:46 GMT
References: <1990Jun21.183931.21226@watmath.waterloo.edu>
Organization: Hewlett Packard Calif. Language Lab
Lines: 13

Reply to Parent Message