Re: Proposed Enhancement to select/case

Article View: comp.std.c

Article #1636

#1636

From: Doug Gwyn
Date: Sun, 02 Sep 1990 11:01

8 lines
867 bytes

In article <1420@lupine.NCD.COM> rfg@NCD.COM (Ron Guilmette) writes:
>Perhaps someone who served on X3J11 could give us a quick
>summary about what happened to case ranges in X3J11.

What do you mean, what happened to them?  They were an unnecessary
invention and so were omitted from the standard, just like thousands
of other such inventions.  This is explained in the cover text to
any of the official X3J11 responses to public review comments.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <13729@smoke.BRL.MIL>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uflorida!haven!adm!smoke!gwyn

References: <BURLEY.90Aug30030645@world.std.com> <1420@lupine.NCD.COM>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uflorida!haven!adm!smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@smoke.BRL.MIL (Doug Gwyn)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Re: Proposed Enhancement to select/case
Message-ID: <13729@smoke.BRL.MIL>
Date: 2 Sep 90 11:01:21 GMT
References: <BURLEY.90Aug30030645@world.std.com> <1420@lupine.NCD.COM>
Organization: U.S. Army Ballistic Research Laboratory, APG, MD.
Lines: 8

Reply to Parent Message