🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.std.c
Article #1686

Re: ANSI assert

#1686
From: Doug Gwyn
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 1990 19:33
12 lines
1342 bytes
In article <17964@haddock.ima.isc.com> karl@kelp.ima.isc.com (Karl Heuer) writes:
>So anyway, I would now propose the following:
>In addition to ``assert'', <assert.h> shall define the macro ``require'',

I would like to suggest that all proposals for additions beyond the turf
already staked out by the C standard be done using new headers, since the
#includer of one of the standard headers now knows that it is safe to, e.g.,
freely use the identifier "require" in his current programs, and it would
be horrible for any future revision of the C standard to make changes that
would invalidate currently strictly conforming code.  (Unless a very strong
case could be made for the necessity of that, but clearly there is no strong
necessity of adding unreserved stuff to existing standard headers.)
Technical Details
Message-ID: <13830@smoke.BRL.MIL>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!mcgill-vision!snorkelwacker!apple!julius.cs.uiuc.edu!wuarchive!udel!haven!adm!smoke!gwyn
References: <1428@proto.COM> <3726@goanna.cs.rmit.oz.au> <17964@haddock.ima.isc.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!mcgill-vision!snorkelwacker!apple!julius.cs.uiuc.edu!wuarchive!udel!haven!adm!smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@smoke.BRL.MIL (Doug Gwyn)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Re: ANSI assert
Keywords: assert, NDEBUG
Message-ID: <13830@smoke.BRL.MIL>
Date: 12 Sep 90 19:33:18 GMT
References: <1428@proto.COM> <3726@goanna.cs.rmit.oz.au> <17964@haddock.ima.isc.com>
Followup-To: alt.lang.cfutures
Organization: U.S. Army Ballistic Research Laboratory, APG, MD.
Lines: 12