Article View: comp.std.c
Article #1686Re: ANSI assert
From: Doug Gwyn
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 1990 19:33
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 1990 19:33
12 lines
1342 bytes
1342 bytes
In article <17964@haddock.ima.isc.com> karl@kelp.ima.isc.com (Karl Heuer) writes: >So anyway, I would now propose the following: >In addition to ``assert'', <assert.h> shall define the macro ``require'', I would like to suggest that all proposals for additions beyond the turf already staked out by the C standard be done using new headers, since the #includer of one of the standard headers now knows that it is safe to, e.g., freely use the identifier "require" in his current programs, and it would be horrible for any future revision of the C standard to make changes that would invalidate currently strictly conforming code. (Unless a very strong case could be made for the necessity of that, but clearly there is no strong necessity of adding unreserved stuff to existing standard headers.)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<13830@smoke.BRL.MIL>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!mcgill-vision!snorkelwacker!apple!julius.cs.uiuc.edu!wuarchive!udel!haven!adm!smoke!gwynReferences:
<1428@proto.COM> <3726@goanna.cs.rmit.oz.au> <17964@haddock.ima.isc.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!mcgill-vision!snorkelwacker!apple!julius.cs.uiuc.edu!wuarchive!udel!haven!adm!smoke!gwyn From: gwyn@smoke.BRL.MIL (Doug Gwyn) Newsgroups: comp.std.c Subject: Re: ANSI assert Keywords: assert, NDEBUG Message-ID: <13830@smoke.BRL.MIL> Date: 12 Sep 90 19:33:18 GMT References: <1428@proto.COM> <3726@goanna.cs.rmit.oz.au> <17964@haddock.ima.isc.com> Followup-To: alt.lang.cfutures Organization: U.S. Army Ballistic Research Laboratory, APG, MD. Lines: 12