Re: PLEASE don't use "long long" for 64 bits + answer to letter

Article View: comp.std.c

Article #182

#182

From: Rahul Dhesi
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 1992 00:54

19 lines
969 bytes

In <1992Apr5.001829.12201@cirrus.com> I wrote:

     It is not a good idea to to allow accidentally repeated words, like
     "long long", to change the the meaning of a declaration.

You may have noticed one or two "accidentally" repeated words in that
article.  Just to make my point more clear, here is the complete list of
repeated words from that article, not including "long long".

     it it
     but but
     could could
     they they
     to to
     the the
     to to
-- 
Rahul Dhesi <dhesi@cirrus.COM>
UUCP:  oliveb!cirrusl!dhesi

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Apr7.005444.10522@cirrus.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!tymix!cirrus!dhesi

References: <yc2ciB2w164w@ersys.edmonton.ab.ca> <1992Apr5.001829.12201@cirrus.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!tymix!cirrus!dhesi
From: dhesi@cirrus.com (Rahul Dhesi)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Re: PLEASE don't use "long long" for 64 bits + answer to letter
Message-ID: <1992Apr7.005444.10522@cirrus.com>
Date: 7 Apr 92 00:54:44 GMT
References: <yc2ciB2w164w@ersys.edmonton.ab.ca> <1992Apr5.001829.12201@cirrus.com>
Sender: news@cirrus.com
Organization: Cirrus Logic Inc.
Lines: 19

Reply to Parent Message