Re: offsetof (was [m]allocation question)

Article View: comp.std.c

Article #1824

#1824

From: Larry Jones
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 1990 22:50

12 lines
863 bytes

In article <469@taumet.com>, steve@taumet.com (Stephen Clamage) writes:
> There is no guarantee that YOU can write a portable offsetof.

In fact, you can't.  That's why offsetof was adopted for the
standard.
----
Larry Jones                         UUCP: uunet!sdrc!thor!scjones
SDRC                                      scjones@thor.UUCP
2000 Eastman Dr.                    BIX:  ltl
Milford, OH  45150-2789             AT&T: (513) 576-2070
Why can't I ever build character in a Miami condo or a casino somewhere?
-- Calvin

Technical Details

Message-ID: <198@thor.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!sdrc!thor!scjones

References: <1990Sep30.192325@objy.objy.com> <469@taumet.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!sdrc!thor!scjones
From: scjones@thor.UUCP (Larry Jones)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Re: offsetof (was [m]allocation question)
Message-ID: <198@thor.UUCP>
Date: 10 Oct 90 22:50:31 GMT
References: <1990Sep30.192325@objy.objy.com> <469@taumet.com>
Organization: SDRC, Cincinnati
Lines: 12

Reply to Parent Message