Article View: comp.std.c
Article #1935Re: A question on volatile accesses
From: Doug Gwyn
Date: Sun, 04 Nov 1990 08:27
Date: Sun, 04 Nov 1990 08:27
7 lines
870 bytes
870 bytes
In article <2402@lupine.NCD.COM> rfg@NCD.COM (Ron Guilmette) writes: >So is this a violation of the ANSI standard or what? It's simply a violation of C. You don't need to look in the standard to know that *++ip means "increment the pointer then fetch what is now pointed at". The value of "++ip" is the only issue here and that has been well defined ever since Dennis invented it.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<14330@smoke.brl.mil>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!aplcen!haven!adm!smoke!gwynReferences:
<2388@lupine.NCD.COM> <27407@mimsy.umd.edu> <2402@lupine.NCD.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!aplcen!haven!adm!smoke!gwyn From: gwyn@smoke.brl.mil (Doug Gwyn) Newsgroups: comp.std.c Subject: Re: A question on volatile accesses Message-ID: <14330@smoke.brl.mil> Date: 4 Nov 90 08:27:16 GMT References: <2388@lupine.NCD.COM> <27407@mimsy.umd.edu> <2402@lupine.NCD.COM> Organization: U.S. Army Ballistic Research Laboratory, APG, MD. Lines: 7