Re: legality of assignment of function to a void *.

Article View: comp.std.c

Article #1970

#1970

From: Doug Gwyn
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 1990 07:12

5 lines
764 bytes

In article <1990Nov12.211511.2344@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu> lijewski@theory.tn.cornell.edu (Mike Lijewski) writes:
>Is a standard conforming compiler required to issue an error
>diagnostic for the following code.  Thanks.

Certainly.  It violates a constraint in section 3.3.16.1.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <14450@smoke.brl.mil>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!uunet!nih-csl!lhc!adm!smoke!gwyn

References: <1990Nov12.211511.2344@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!uunet!nih-csl!lhc!adm!smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@smoke.brl.mil (Doug Gwyn)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Re: legality of assignment of function to a void *.
Message-ID: <14450@smoke.brl.mil>
Date: 13 Nov 90 07:12:11 GMT
References: <1990Nov12.211511.2344@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu>
Organization: U.S. Army Ballistic Research Laboratory, APG, MD.
Lines: 5

Reply to Parent Message