Article View: comp.std.c
Article #1996Re: Another sizeof question
From: Doug Gwyn
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 1990 14:29
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 1990 14:29
9 lines
1129 bytes
1129 bytes
In article <3928@male.EBay.Sun.COM> diamond@tkou02.enet.dec.com (diamond@tkovoa) writes: >If this is really true, it defeats the purpose of #pragma. My understanding >was that #pragma may have any implementation-defined effect WHICH does not >change the meaning of a conforming program (though it may change the effect >of a nonconforming program). That definition would have been far more useful. That was my argument, but when Walter Murray requested a formal ruling on this, even I had to agree that the wording in the C standard leads to the conclusion that a strictly conforming program cannot use #pragma.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<14505@smoke.brl.mil>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!sdd.hp.com!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!aplcen!haven!adm!smoke!gwynReferences:
<1990Nov2.034300.3065@tkou02.enet.dec.com> <4146@se-sd.SanDiego.NCR.COM> <3928@male.EBay.Sun.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!sdd.hp.com!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!aplcen!haven!adm!smoke!gwyn From: gwyn@smoke.brl.mil (Doug Gwyn) Newsgroups: comp.std.c Subject: Re: Another sizeof question Message-ID: <14505@smoke.brl.mil> Date: 17 Nov 90 14:29:42 GMT References: <1990Nov2.034300.3065@tkou02.enet.dec.com> <4146@se-sd.SanDiego.NCR.COM> <3928@male.EBay.Sun.COM> Organization: U.S. Army Ballistic Research Laboratory, APG, MD. Lines: 9