🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Nov6.013858.736@netcom.com> rfg@netcom.com (Ronald F. Guilmette) writes:
>Can we all agree that:
>	typedef float;
>... violates the first constraint in section 3.5?

I can agree, but ALL of us?  Good luck  :-)

>Good.  Now what about these odd looking declarations:
>	typedef struct S;
>	typedef enum { red, green, blue };
>It appears that these are standard conforming, yes?

Yup.  There's a famous line saying something like, rules that would prohibit
ugly code would also prohibit good code.  Now this raises the question of
why the first constraint in section 3.5 is there in the first place.
--
Norman Diamond       diamond@jit081.enet.dec.com
If this were the company's opinion, I wouldn't be allowed to post it.
"It's been a lovely recession."