🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Nov6.015516.2350@netcom.com> rfg@netcom.com (Ronald F. Guilmette) writes:
>In 4.8.1.1 it says:
>	"The parameter paramN is the identifier of the rightmost
>	parameter..."
>Is this a restriction of standard conforming programs?

This time I'll get it write.
s/standard conforming programs/strictly conforming programs/whew

Yes.

>On standard conforming implementations?

How could it be?  The program is the one with code invoking va_start().

>Note that some implementations permit:
>	#include <stdarg.h>
>	va_list ap;
>	void foobar (int arg1, ...) {
>		va_start (ap, any bloddy thing you want!$#^% );
>	}

Some implementations permit dereferencing null pointers too.
There's no Constraints paragraph in section 4.8.1.1.
--
Norman Diamond       diamond@jit081.enet.dec.com
If this were the company's opinion, I wouldn't be allowed to post it.
"It's been a lovely recession."