Article View: comp.std.c
Article #2204Re: should abs() be 'uint'?
From: T. William Wells
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 1992 09:01
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 1992 09:01
11 lines
839 bytes
839 bytes
In article <eyal.717980448@ise> eyal@echo.canberra.edu.au (Eyal Lebedinsky) writes:
: Anyone else has pet problems with abs?
Not here. I'm not foolish enough to try to use a function for
something it isn't designed to do. If you want an unsigned abs
function, for goddess' sake WRITE one. Don't waste your and our
time bitching about the existing function.
---
Bill { rutgers | decwrl | telesci }!twwells!bill
bill@twwells.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<BvLAE3.4Bt@twwells.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!decwrl!twwells!billReferences:
<1992Sep30.040719.2852@waggen.twuug.com> <BvEp3G.540@zoo.toronto.edu> <eyal.717980448@ise>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.std.c Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!decwrl!twwells!bill From: bill@twwells.com (T. William Wells) Subject: Re: should abs() be 'uint'? Date: Sun, 4 Oct 1992 09:01:12 GMT Message-ID: <BvLAE3.4Bt@twwells.com> References: <1992Sep30.040719.2852@waggen.twuug.com> <BvEp3G.540@zoo.toronto.edu> <eyal.717980448@ise> Organization: None, Mt. Laurel, NJ Lines: 11