Article View: comp.std.c
Article #2302Re: comment style
From: Doug Gwyn
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 1991 08:43
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 1991 08:43
15 lines
1156 bytes
1156 bytes
In article <18701:Jan1916:03:2691@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> brnstnd@kramden.acf.nyu.edu (Dan Bernstein) writes: >Why can't people get together here and discuss how (and if) to propose >// to ANSI for the next revision of the standard? Several points: I understand that there is another newsgroup for such discussions. People proposing // seem unaware that this has already been considered and rejected for the C standard. No arguments have been made that would justify reopening the issue. It will be several years before the ANSI C committee will be soliciting public comment for the next revision of the C standard. Thus this newsgroup is not presently a useful place for such discussions.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<14906@smoke.brl.mil>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!wuarchive!udel!haven!adm!smoke!gwynReferences:
<4427@alliant.Alliant.COM> <14838@smoke.brl.mil> <18701:Jan1916:03:2691@kramden.acf.nyu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!wuarchive!udel!haven!adm!smoke!gwyn From: gwyn@smoke.brl.mil (Doug Gwyn) Newsgroups: comp.std.c Subject: Re: comment style Message-ID: <14906@smoke.brl.mil> Date: 20 Jan 91 08:43:04 GMT References: <4427@alliant.Alliant.COM> <14838@smoke.brl.mil> <18701:Jan1916:03:2691@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> Organization: U.S. Army Ballistic Research Laboratory, APG, MD. Lines: 15