Re: Why no arithmetic on void *

Article View: comp.std.c

Article #2322

#2322

From: Doug Gwyn
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 1991 23:45

5 lines
729 bytes

In article <561@taumet.com> steve@taumet.com (Stephen Clamage) writes:
>Void* was an invention of the Committee to cover the case of "pointer to
>something of unknown type".

I would rather say, "pointer to object of irrelevant type".

Technical Details

Message-ID: <14950@smoke.brl.mil>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!usc!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ncar!hsdndev!cmcl2!adm!smoke!gwyn

References: <1238@dkunix9.dk.oracle.com> <561@taumet.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!usc!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ncar!hsdndev!cmcl2!adm!smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@smoke.brl.mil (Doug Gwyn)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Re: Why no arithmetic on void *
Message-ID: <14950@smoke.brl.mil>
Date: 23 Jan 91 23:45:38 GMT
References: <1238@dkunix9.dk.oracle.com> <561@taumet.com>
Organization: U.S. Army Ballistic Research Laboratory, APG, MD.
Lines: 5

Reply to Parent Message