Article View: comp.std.c
Article #2360Re: typedefing functions (Re: Is typedef char BUFFER[20] legal?)
From: Erik Naggum
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 1991 01:28
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 1991 01:28
12 lines
1095 bytes
1095 bytes
In article <ENAG.91Feb4192806@holmenkollen.ifi.uio.no>, Erik Naggum writes:
> The functions would be declared
>
> f foo
> { ... }
I have been informed that this is entirely bogus.
--
[Erik Naggum] <enag@ifi.uio.no>
Naggum Software, Oslo, Norway <erik@naggum.uu.no>
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<ENAG.91Feb5022846@holmenkollen.ifi.uio.no>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!uupsi!sunic!ugle.unit.no!nuug!ifi!enagReferences:
<1212@tredysvr.Tredydev.Unisys.COM> <1991Jan29.210100.8105@zoo.toronto.edu> <22642@netcom.UUCP> <1991Feb3.000128.15980@zoo.toronto.edu> <1991Feb4.053613.3758@watmath.waterloo.edu> <ENAG.91Feb4192806@holmenkollen.ifi.uio.no>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!uupsi!sunic!ugle.unit.no!nuug!ifi!enag From: enag@ifi.uio.no (Erik Naggum) Newsgroups: comp.std.c Subject: Re: typedefing functions (Re: Is typedef char BUFFER[20] legal?) Message-ID: <ENAG.91Feb5022846@holmenkollen.ifi.uio.no> Date: 5 Feb 91 01:28:56 GMT References: <1212@tredysvr.Tredydev.Unisys.COM> <1991Jan29.210100.8105@zoo.toronto.edu> <22642@netcom.UUCP> <1991Feb3.000128.15980@zoo.toronto.edu> <1991Feb4.053613.3758@watmath.waterloo.edu> <ENAG.91Feb4192806@holmenkollen.ifi.uio.no> Sender: enag@ifi.uio.no (Erik Naggum) Followup-To: comp.std.c Organization: Naggum Software, Oslo, Norway Lines: 12 In-Reply-To: enag@ifi.uio.no's message of Mon, 4 Feb 91 18:28:19 GMT