Article View: comp.std.c
Article #2566no type-specifier ==> int
From: Blair P. Houghton
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1991 04:59
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1991 04:59
10 lines
841 bytes
841 bytes
Anyone see more verbose evidence that a blank type-specifier indicates type-specifier `int' than the two instances of, "or no type specifiers," at (ANSI X3.159-1989, sec. 3.5.2, p. 60, ll. 11 and 26)? --Blair "If the signature contains a blank quotation or no quotation, then the reader will behave exactly as if the signer had made an uproarious witticism."
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3119@inews.intel.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!rice!uw-beaver!milton!ogicse!intelhf!ichips!iwarp.intel.com!inews!hopi!bhoughtoShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!rice!uw-beaver!milton!ogicse!intelhf!ichips!iwarp.intel.com!inews!hopi!bhoughto From: bhoughto@hopi.intel.com (Blair P. Houghton) Newsgroups: comp.std.c Subject: no type-specifier ==> int Message-ID: <3119@inews.intel.com> Date: 19 Mar 91 04:59:47 GMT Sender: news@inews.intel.com Organization: Intel Corp, Chandler, AZ Lines: 10