Article View: comp.std.c
Article #2570Re: Function Argument Evaluation
From: Doug Gwyn
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1991 00:59
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1991 00:59
5 lines
723 bytes
723 bytes
In article <17750@crdgw1.crd.ge.com> volpe@camelback.crd.ge.com (Christopher R Volpe) writes: >So, the output has to be "100 200". Wrong. "200 200" is a possible output from a conforming implementation. I thought the cited section of the standard was unusually clear about this.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<15538@smoke.brl.mil>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!hsdndev!cmcl2!adm!smoke!gwynReferences:
<7621@polstra.UUCP> <17750@crdgw1.crd.ge.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!hsdndev!cmcl2!adm!smoke!gwyn From: gwyn@smoke.brl.mil (Doug Gwyn) Newsgroups: comp.std.c Subject: Re: Function Argument Evaluation Message-ID: <15538@smoke.brl.mil> Date: 21 Mar 91 00:59:46 GMT References: <7621@polstra.UUCP> <17750@crdgw1.crd.ge.com> Organization: U.S. Army Ballistic Research Laboratory, APG, MD. Lines: 5