Article View: comp.std.c
Article #2590Re: Function Argument Evaluation
From: Dik T. Winter
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 1991 21:41
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 1991 21:41
13 lines
990 bytes
990 bytes
In article <17868@crdgw1.crd.ge.com> volpe@camelback.crd.ge.com (Christopher R Volpe) writes: > In article <1991Mar23.014442.24307@cs.ucla.edu>, jon@maui.cs.ucla.edu > (Jonathan Gingerich) writes: > |>don't see how this affects the value of (p=&x) and (p=&y) which would > |>remain &x and &y (given the correct type of p). > Ditto, again. You both fail to see that the value of (lvalue = expression) is *not* the value of 'expression' before assignment but the value of 'lvalue' after assignment. -- dik t. winter, cwi, amsterdam, nederland dik@cwi.nl
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3216@charon.cwi.nl>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!hp4nl!charon!dikReferences:
<15552@smoke.brl.mil> <1991Mar23.014442.24307@cs.ucla.edu> <17868@crdgw1.crd.ge.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!hp4nl!charon!dik From: dik@cwi.nl (Dik T. Winter) Newsgroups: comp.std.c Subject: Re: Function Argument Evaluation Message-ID: <3216@charon.cwi.nl> Date: 25 Mar 91 21:41:57 GMT References: <15552@smoke.brl.mil> <1991Mar23.014442.24307@cs.ucla.edu> <17868@crdgw1.crd.ge.com> Sender: news@cwi.nl Organization: CWI, Amsterdam Lines: 13