Re: Is this a bug in Quick C?

Article View: comp.std.c

Article #2650

#2650

From: Doug Gwyn
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 1991 14:48

8 lines
924 bytes

In article <1991Mar29.220525.3927@odin.diku.dk> thorinn@diku.dk (Lars Henrik Mathiesen) writes:
>I assume you refer to the discussion in section 7.9.3

I know about that; I helped come up with the wording for it.
I interpreted the original posting as saying that Quick C was
consuming an extra newline.  That is NOT expected behavior,
even if one could get around it by announcing that as part of
"the way that terminals interpret newlines" in the implementation.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <15641@smoke.brl.mil>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!samsung!think.com!paperboy!hsdndev!cmcl2!adm!smoke!gwyn

References: <s64421.668684042@zeus> <15440@smoke.brl.mil> <1991Mar29.220525.3927@odin.diku.dk>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!samsung!think.com!paperboy!hsdndev!cmcl2!adm!smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@smoke.brl.mil (Doug Gwyn)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Re: Is this a bug in Quick C?
Message-ID: <15641@smoke.brl.mil>
Date: 30 Mar 91 14:48:04 GMT
References: <s64421.668684042@zeus> <15440@smoke.brl.mil> <1991Mar29.220525.3927@odin.diku.dk>
Organization: U.S. Army Ballistic Research Laboratory, APG, MD.
Lines: 8

Reply to Parent Message