Article View: comp.std.c
Article #2701Re: ISO 646 alternate representation
From: Doug Gwyn
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 1991 00:59
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 1991 00:59
6 lines
810 bytes
810 bytes
In article <keld.671027491@dkuugin> keld@login.dkuug.dk (Keld J|rn Simonsen) writes: >ISO 9899:1990 supports ISO DIS 646 IRV, not the invariant part of 646. I hope you'll explain this, as I thought that ISO 9899:1990 supported use of that portion of ISO 646 that was common to all national variants. If that is not "the invariant part", then what is?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<15748@smoke.brl.mil>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!hsdndev!cmcl2!adm!smoke!gwynReferences:
<keld.670872140@dkuugin> <15738@smoke.brl.mil> <keld.671027491@dkuugin>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!hsdndev!cmcl2!adm!smoke!gwyn From: gwyn@smoke.brl.mil (Doug Gwyn) Newsgroups: comp.std.c Subject: Re: ISO 646 alternate representation Message-ID: <15748@smoke.brl.mil> Date: 8 Apr 91 00:59:48 GMT References: <keld.670872140@dkuugin> <15738@smoke.brl.mil> <keld.671027491@dkuugin> Organization: U.S. Army Ballistic Research Laboratory, APG, MD. Lines: 6