Article View: comp.std.c
Article #2733Re: Is va_list defined by <stdio.h>?
From: Blair P. Houghton
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 1991 00:53
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 1991 00:53
14 lines
959 bytes
959 bytes
In article <15781@smoke.brl.mil> gwyn@smoke.brl.mil (Doug Gwyn) writes: >Many of the top C experts in the world disagreed with you. >I think the standard has this exactly right. Is there a good reason why v*printf() aren't declared in <stdarg.h>? The only one I can think of is an issue of categorization that seems to have overwhelmed one of usage. How could you use v*printf() without <stdarg.h>? --Blair "I'm still avoiding varargs by proper top-down design..."
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3769@inews.intel.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usenet!ogicse!intelhf!ichips!inews!bishop!bhoughtoReferences:
<11852@dog.ee.lbl.gov> <16965@hoptoad.uucp> <15781@smoke.brl.mil>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usenet!ogicse!intelhf!ichips!inews!bishop!bhoughto From: bhoughto@bishop.intel.com (Blair P. Houghton) Newsgroups: comp.std.c Subject: Re: Is va_list defined by <stdio.h>? Message-ID: <3769@inews.intel.com> Date: 11 Apr 91 00:53:38 GMT References: <11852@dog.ee.lbl.gov> <16965@hoptoad.uucp> <15781@smoke.brl.mil> Sender: news@inews.intel.com Organization: Intel Corp, Chandler, AZ Lines: 14